Re: [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct-09

Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com> Mon, 15 June 2020 13:10 UTC

Return-Path: <derek@ihtfp.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4C13A0D62 for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 06:10:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ihtfp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FAVraGh4GkSD for <secdir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 06:10:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org (MAIL2.IHTFP.ORG [204.107.200.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCAE33A0D5E for <secdir@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 06:10:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695E1E2048; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 09:10:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail2.ihtfp.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail2.ihtfp.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15280-05; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 09:10:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from securerf.ihtfp.org (IHTFP-DHCP-158.IHTFP.ORG [192.168.248.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mocana.ihtfp.org", Issuer "IHTFP Consulting Certification Authority" (not verified)) by mail2.ihtfp.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E032E203F; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 09:10:39 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ihtfp.com; s=default; t=1592226639; bh=WdRp4ge8c4is5XT5quVb6Ji7NX2/UntZIzlczBCTDvA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ZgwrHcKbQKGwNzLV4xiLSYkDV+Aj+gT7PgSCE+k9WNdCHDAXw9XV2BB+JMTF79TQS D/t+liQVUSIKWe4R1WAmLW8dU6FT8hQ+5fi9c8JdNelhxloKaJrax53a/vZW1lNL0f 9oVg3j/KP13Bt8Yuwa94QIiAB0Hodq0ZBiC/m7Cg=
Received: (from warlord@localhost) by securerf.ihtfp.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 05FDAcgq006726; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 09:10:38 -0400
From: Derek Atkins <derek@ihtfp.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: secdir@ietf.org
References: <sjm36728ul4.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org> <20200614050638.GI11992@kduck.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 09:10:38 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20200614050638.GI11992@kduck.mit.edu> (Benjamin Kaduk's message of "Sat, 13 Jun 2020 22:06:38 -0700")
Message-ID: <sjm1rmg79v5.fsf@securerf.ihtfp.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2a
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/xWH1S8i5CBSk3rDMLwh7g8C6-lg>
Subject: Re: [secdir] sec-dir review of draft-ietf-cose-rfc8152bis-struct-09
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 13:10:48 -0000

Hi Ben,

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> writes:

> Thanks Derek, we appreciate having the extra set of expert eyes.
> Roman put a Discuss in about making sure the data structure names we use
> are consistent/correct, and I had one that's being picky about the Internet
> Standard criteria and whether one feature qualifies for it.

Yes, I saw your two discusses as well.

When I was reviewing it I was focusing on the security considerations
and not on all those consistency issues.

> -Ben

-derek

-- 
       Derek Atkins                 617-623-3745
       derek@ihtfp.com             www.ihtfp.com
       Computer and Internet Security Consultant