Re: [secdir] [lamps] Secdir early review of draft-ietf-lamps-rfc7030-csrattrs-08

[Sean Turner <[e-mail]>]

> On Apr 3, 2024, at 09:21, Michael Richardson <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Signed PGP part
> 
> Valery Smyslov via Datatracker <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
> 
> Thank you.
> 
>> Nits: 1. This draft updates RFC 7030, but this is not indicated in its
>> header.
> 
> fixed.
> 
>> 2. It seems to me that definition of
>> id-aa-certificationRequestInfoTemplate in the Section 3.3 and in the
>> Appendix A lacks the name of the new element in OID (only value "TBD2"
>> is present).
> 
> I see, we didn't really give it a clear name.
> I think that we should also link in the IANA Considerations TBD1/TBD2.
> I'm not sure what name we should give to TBD2.  Sean?

For the list, yeah I should have put a name in front of TBD2; Michael has one in the editor’s copy that works.  The link in the IANA considerations is also a good idea.

spt

>> 3. Section 3.2, typo: s/MUST by/MUST be
>> 4. Section 3.3, typo, perhaps: s/The avoid this drawback/To avoid this
>> drawback
>> 5. Section 3.3, possible typo: s/The SubjectPublicKeyInfo field must be
>> present/The SubjectPublicKeyInfo field MUST be present
> 
> Thank you, updated.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <[e-mail]>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>