IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Secdispatch] [EXTERNAL] Re: IETF117 - Call for topics

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 23 June 2023 09:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D2DC15108E for <secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 02:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4WWpSO4NBxUD for <secdispatch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 02:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22c.google.com (mail-lj1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57128C1BE865 for <secdispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 02:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2b46a06c553so7488851fa.1 for <secdispatch@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 02:30:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1687512607; x=1690104607; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=P+jSn06yveVp6xz24HElpmOLw3XBLQs80zKHMPu9Jas=; b=pIivWIb+LbTZ+iVJS7BTdC2JLbFGwgJNK/trcAzke3JhrCaR3nIwymbmkYQ31XdcvS j75DmM16rYUvv0XXL61lRvbwvi1tVtZzVIY4XMXovkXnSPtheaUMjvDXvfVgHixcct3h Q3V+nS12NMnvuz4/9ZBkJsJz6+1JB8DkvpGmQW7o12SWCziC+B2jRg2MkJs5jvTQ97Wd GqnhVsJnwmVEfX7BBBg/NBlMx4FFD6Qs+UnZ4lkswhXdQM+WeYUQAO5+uEn2DeuDd0Tx Z/Hz1p2HT3Vee43bU8HK/xDYXLIA47hRzGTH8VL4tpfW5ZjrKSiP9h/qNk8uBSiWqNe1 bByA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687512607; x=1690104607; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=P+jSn06yveVp6xz24HElpmOLw3XBLQs80zKHMPu9Jas=; b=fcoQoDpK2WZznpM0mjchfz24IDJcWZTFfJjgZ/qKMsg0nyQG5UlkQUriQqlOe/XlVw B24VRUNGDYvJ64t2ymn7JWP/eZKyku6g/CPu4H73np+YYw37WoBrHpEOsgTB2UNAnpFH K6HpewPRGsTNwkkkb3cHCYn0cDZJSpE2oXN/Z8kZnl5lHSo3cM6UARPYVs+wCbUqzOWt aT9JNuwFkrfYOHGLhxgtIeXmecuvMq/kaRWn3kW4ZOPHZM1SRsqloTqBLycg020TwK8v BSNJZVC6DcucTzTAdi3TIzPb6zJMStqEGPgBaUetyTS5Sx00vOu0MxqmyjTGgtro4BEn O3ag==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDw2X4m57ZCOg7ylhrlp76J1LjIftXvH8MXjFRzdAuTDbZ6IlteE Id687hDBKMpilBARrAROKOVUlOuThiVusA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ7dsN2uS2heO5uO0RDDC1Wf4LGs54sY2go1KpXypNLrQfCqafL/9rhWRSbdSRfv1BKFGj7YBg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3b1:b0:4f8:6680:6ed with SMTP id v17-20020a05651203b100b004f8668006edmr10240898lfp.12.1687512606726; Fri, 23 Jun 2023 02:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (84.94.37.215.cable.012.net.il. [84.94.37.215]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 14-20020a05600c020e00b003f8d6647661sm1809162wmi.15.2023.06.23.02.30.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 23 Jun 2023 02:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.600.7\))
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <10b52b08-c102-329e-dfbd-9e993dcc923e@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 12:29:54 +0300
Cc: Mike Ounsworth <Mike.Ounsworth=40entrust.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.ietf@gmail.com>, secdispatch <secdispatch@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F6C70FA2-21F9-4135-AE4C-084104A4140C@gmail.com>
References: <CADNypP8D_qp6fPvWkWnw7hDRppHSkaxpTSBtMbcRkE+ZpS+WBw@mail.gmail.com> <3A66635D-6087-4D87-901A-A9C936A01C12@gmail.com> <CADNypP9h7TaC+VnmUihkcq3pWmqzuq3U1E9z4x3F_9PA8Vn8Aw@mail.gmail.com> <5b77f2aa7b39fe8add9bb6459db323609e2671e8.camel@infradead.org> <54209.1687443106@dyas> <1943D5A5-71B2-42CC-8FD8-832CC1971E9D@gmail.com> <CH0PR11MB573982AEAC43E1B40B2F4D4C9F22A@CH0PR11MB5739.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <10b52b08-c102-329e-dfbd-9e993dcc923e@cs.tcd.ie>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.600.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdispatch/jSTZ3cC6iKFUXQniVErSLvGcf0Y>
Subject: Re: [Secdispatch] [EXTERNAL] Re: IETF117 - Call for topics
X-BeenThere: secdispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Dispatch <secdispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdispatch>, <mailto:secdispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 09:30:13 -0000


> On 22 Jun 2023, at 21:06, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hiya,
> 
> On 22/06/2023 19:01, Mike Ounsworth wrote:
>> I also support a BoF about hybrid signatures.
> 
> FWIW: I would not support the above. The BoF I think
> we need would address evolving PKI in the face of a
> CRQC.
> 
> Discussion of hybrid signatures would be a part of
> that, but just a part.
> 

That’s not going to happen. If everything’s in scope then the BoF will discuss everything all at once, and take forever and not reach any conclusions. 

I think a BoF about hybrid signatures is appropriate as long as one of the topics is “do we really need them?”

Yoav

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email