Re: SSH File Transfer Protocol - draft-moonesamy-secsh-filexfer-00

Richard Kettlewell <rjk@terraraq.org.uk> Fri, 06 September 2013 20:22 UTC

Return-Path: <bounces-ietf-ssh-owner-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive=lists.ietf.org@NetBSD.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734A111E812C for <ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 13:22:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vV8dzMAazLwn for <ietfarch-secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 13:22:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netbsd.org (mail.NetBSD.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:7::25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC06911E80F4 for <secsh-tyoxbijeg7-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 13:22:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix, from userid 605) id 40EA814A1A8; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 20:22:48 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ietf-ssh@NetBSD.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC8B14A15B for <ietf-ssh@NetBSD.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 20:22:46 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at NetBSD.org
Received: from mail.netbsd.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.NetBSD.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id RXBQIY3WWDGw for <ietf-ssh@NetBSD.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 20:22:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk (v6.chiark.greenend.org.uk [IPv6:2001:ba8:1e3::]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.netbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F3F614A158 for <ietf-ssh@NetBSD.org>; Fri, 6 Sep 2013 20:22:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [172.17.207.18] (helo=araminta.anjou.terraraq.org.uk) by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 4.72 #1) with esmtps (return-path rjk@terraraq.org.uk) id 1VI2YE-0000CX-NQ; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 21:22:42 +0100
Received: from lyonesse.anjou.terraraq.org.uk ([172.17.207.4]) by araminta.anjou.terraraq.org.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <rjk@terraraq.org.uk>) id 1VI2YD-0003QF-Qa; Fri, 06 Sep 2013 21:22:41 +0100
Message-ID: <522A3991.6020309@terraraq.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 21:22:41 +0100
From: Richard Kettlewell <rjk@terraraq.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joseph Galbriath <galb-list@vandyke.com>
CC: "ietf-ssh@NetBSD.org" <ietf-ssh@NetBSD.org>
Subject: Re: SSH File Transfer Protocol - draft-moonesamy-secsh-filexfer-00
References: <9A043F3CF02CD34C8E74AC1594475C734470C9DE@uxcn10-6.UoA.auckland.ac.nz> <6.2.5.6.2.20130712050150.0cd0f7e8@elandnews.com> <33d1f2bbe99843448ee8e993d701b14f@BL2PR08MB004.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <51E3C0FE.7070806@panix.com> <2900.1373893699@eng-mail01.juniper.net> <51ED561D.4010407@vandyke.com>
In-Reply-To: <51ED561D.4010407@vandyke.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-ssh-owner@NetBSD.org
List-Id: ietf-ssh.NetBSD.org
Precedence: list

On 22/07/13 16:56, Joseph Galbriath wrote:
> On 2013/07/15 7:08, Mark D. Baushke wrote:
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> [+cc Richard Kettlewell (see the archives of ietf-ssh
>> with this Subject: thread for more information)]
>>
>> There seems to be a fairly good chart given in
>>
>>      http://www.greenend.org.uk/rjk/sftp/sftpversions.html
>
> This is a pretty nice summation of the various sftp protocol
> versions.
>
> The extensions mentioned as "Defined in draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer-09.txt
> but for some reason not later versions" were moved from the main
> filexfer draft to the extensions draft to reduce the size of the main
> draft and make it clear that it wasn't necessary to implement them
> to have a conforming implementation.  (Maybe we should of have done
> this with more features, like the block/unblock stuff as well.)
>
> I just posted a link to that draft in another part of this
> thread, but here it is again:
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-secsh-filexfer-extensions/

Thanks, I've updated my page.

ttfn/rjk