Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

John Lemon <john.lemon@broadcom.com> Wed, 09 May 2018 21:42 UTC

Return-Path: <john.lemon@broadcom.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1605412DB6E for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2018 14:42:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=broadcom.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y2pxVF9DzuuC for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 May 2018 14:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x230.google.com (mail-wr0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 407A1129C6B for <sfc@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 May 2018 14:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x230.google.com with SMTP id p4-v6so27598wrh.3 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 May 2018 14:42:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=yFnykrw2UnGSAv1RnNVXEd4ME+cpjhAazsWq9csej2g=; b=bKPbv6B1sWfJedMFhL1DrovGbhBe88DwE5GcnhwMNiL+oiGCYwoAmq7QCjiQclTirO syOAD3UqGAr9HEZM4oWDUt6eFHwQescJvNsEhC2V/5qr+9UyDBK28TZUg3BldHUCh04O K4QYcMmCuKw/0znA0BZVvCoFvEWvH+31E0OQ0=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=yFnykrw2UnGSAv1RnNVXEd4ME+cpjhAazsWq9csej2g=; b=Wk5EUKCjwFgX5fz5Aql5Xo5bIZBBwXvXaiGlRiqKU/bHEaBVyekDjy+Pc8cpESVPVb D4gf/pud5/6jw14BGdbaCR4gEKdhbls+I65TN31HYUzEt/tCN8nDYd5hKyB8JGVghnZD JVQwX4y7UF8q/c0dAAsFOCZQjyzvKJd1E3vQ6f963FywLC9EiaqZ/QRKBkHWzeqTkV33 E55Wmw+BFDeTy4q/aTORgbK8JvZjzWEDr/zySrCGwz28LiRB2NpgAWM2zJc+V2sCyIbr AMznA7edUdubZY0fZ0gG8Zu3wMyVSRy8iLRwRcKVHwlJTU5x9iccvPuOkB376HOKsy/e ZoTw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tBB9co6qKQvpONmE6DKqcuSC3fVxRagi84kHY8JBYOTB4QJoNM9 9Kxuv1UKi08kc/c3/ED5AznuMi178Q2JQQQ9q8PKDg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZr6Sw1SsSO7E5VFnkSoD7ZkbGK3b684ifZ+HJdzn+q3wPUHSesJBlAg/y0CtWs41d4Pa2N3XSKJVArQp2rs5aE=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:a9aa:: with SMTP id b39-v6mr38775168wrd.36.1525902162601; Wed, 09 May 2018 14:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.157.129 with HTTP; Wed, 9 May 2018 14:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: John Lemon <john.lemon@broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 14:42:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPOJaHx5LJ5F6YiWKB6h8K7c+-O1GZpZRP4Spk8VESCOHV_VFA@mail.gmail.com>
To: sfc-chairs@ietf.org, Service Function Chaining IETF list <sfc@ietf.org>, draft-brockners-proof-of-transit@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005d51a8056bccc8dc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/8Z39oBoJ9FbEOYDJSg_1XczQ_QA>
Subject: Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 21:42:48 -0000

I support the adoption of this draft.
John

    -----Original Message-----
    From: sfc <sfc-bounces@ietf.org> <sfc-bounces@ietf.org&gt>; On
Behalf Of IETF Secretariat
    Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 2:28 PM
    To: draft-brockners-proof-of-transit@ietf.org;
sfc-chairs@ietf.org; sfc@ietf.org
    Subject: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed
draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG
Issued"


    The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state
Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Joel Halpern)

    The document is available at
    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brockners-proof-of-transit/

    Comment:
    As discussed in London, and requested by the document authors,
this is a two week call for adoption for this document. Reminder: the
question is not whether this is done, but rather whether this is a
good start on work the working group would like to advance.

    Please speak up.  Silence is NOT consent.
    Given the long list of authors, the chairs particularly need to
hear from non-authors.

    Yours,
    Joel (& Jim)

    PS: The issue of there being too many authors will be dealt with separately.
    That is not an obstacle to adoption, merely an annoyance to the chairs.

    _______________________________________________
    sfc mailing list
    sfc@ietf.org
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc