[sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org> Mon, 07 May 2018 12:27 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietf.org
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7625E12D958; Mon, 7 May 2018 05:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
To: draft-brockners-proof-of-transit@ietf.org, sfc-chairs@ietf.org, sfc@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.79.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152569607848.1439.13053030504229319467.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 05:27:58 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/ITJpsODMk4u_pW6fTPLjBmTDuH0>
Subject: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 12:27:58 -0000
The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Joel Halpern) The document is available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brockners-proof-of-transit/ Comment: As discussed in London, and requested by the document authors, this is a two week call for adoption for this document. Reminder: the question is not whether this is done, but rather whether this is a good start on work the working group would like to advance. Please speak up. Silence is NOT consent. Given the long list of authors, the chairs particularly need to hear from non-authors. Yours, Joel (& Jim) PS: The issue of there being too many authors will be dealt with separately. That is not an obstacle to adoption, merely an annoyance to the chairs.
- [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof… IETF Secretariat
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Bernier, Daniel
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Roberta Maglione (robmgl)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Reinaldo Penno (repenno)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… John Lemon
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Shwetha Bhandari (shwethab)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Akshaya Nadahalli
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Diego R. Lopez
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Mickey Spiegel
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Purkayastha, Debashish
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Aviv Kfir
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Tal Mizrahi
- Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-p… Srihari Raghavan (srihari)