[sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org> Mon, 07 May 2018 12:27 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietf.org
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7625E12D958; Mon, 7 May 2018 05:27:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: IETF Secretariat <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org>
To: draft-brockners-proof-of-transit@ietf.org, sfc-chairs@ietf.org, sfc@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.79.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152569607848.1439.13053030504229319467.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 05:27:58 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/ITJpsODMk4u_pW6fTPLjBmTDuH0>
Subject: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2018 12:27:58 -0000

The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state
Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Joel Halpern)

The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brockners-proof-of-transit/

Comment:
As discussed in London, and requested by the document authors, this is a two
week call for adoption for this document. Reminder: the question is not
whether this is done, but rather whether this is a good start on work the
working group would like to advance.

Please speak up.  Silence is NOT consent.
Given the long list of authors, the chairs particularly need to hear from
non-authors.

Yours,
Joel (& Jim)

PS: The issue of there being too many authors will be dealt with separately. 
That is not an obstacle to adoption, merely an annoyance to the chairs.