Re: [sfc] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-sfc-hierarchical-09: (with COMMENT)
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 21 June 2018 03:19 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7726130F88; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 20:19:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.879
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ARrIc8ZBHhL; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 20:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E53BC130EE1; Wed, 20 Jun 2018 20:19:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.95] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w5L3JjTT087391 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 20 Jun 2018 22:19:45 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.95]
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Message-Id: <DF74F7C3-02D1-4465-BB11-3361B23B82C9@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0E7079CA-C70C-44F0-80C0-88541D9A8346"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.4 \(3445.8.2\))
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2018 22:19:44 -0500
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DF49035@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-sfc-hierarchical@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sfc-hierarchical@ietf.org>, "sarikaya@ieee.org" <sarikaya@ieee.org>, "sfc-chairs@ietf.org" <sfc-chairs@ietf.org>, "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
References: <152946506975.32330.12254535644684416668.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B93302DF49035@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.8.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/ADy8LmDMVryJQAhZQA34BkK5BK0>
Subject: Re: [sfc] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-sfc-hierarchical-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 03:19:52 -0000
That change works for me. Thanks! Ben. > On Jun 20, 2018, at 1:09 AM, mohamed.boucadair@orange.com wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > Thank you for the comment. > > Please see inline . > > Cheers, > Med > >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : Ben Campbell [mailto:ben@nostrum.com] >> Envoyé : mercredi 20 juin 2018 05:24 >> À : The IESG >> Cc : draft-ietf-sfc-hierarchical@ietf.org; Behcet Sarikaya; sfc- >> chairs@ietf.org; sarikaya@ieee.org; sfc@ietf.org >> Objet : Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-sfc-hierarchical-09: (with >> COMMENT) >> >> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-sfc-hierarchical-09: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-hierarchical/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> §10: "This document describes systems that may be managed by distinct teams >> of >> a single administrative entity." >> >> I had to re-read this a few times to realize you meant distinct teams that >> are >> all part of the same entity, not distinct teams each made up of one entity. >> > > [Med] We can change this sentence to: > > "This document describes systems that may be managed by distinct teams, which all belong to the same administrative entity."
- Re: [sfc] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ie… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ie… Ben Campbell
- Re: [sfc] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ie… mohamed.boucadair
- [sfc] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-s… Ben Campbell