[sfc] Request for Comments from working group : Packet Loss Measurement for SFC
"Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL)" <anil.sn@huawei.com> Thu, 07 January 2016 09:28 UTC
Return-Path: <anil.sn@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08971A8836 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 01:28:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FahwW5vYQBUk for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 01:28:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 417BF1A882F for <sfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 01:28:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CCP24791; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 09:28:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML707-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.199) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 09:28:51 +0000
Received: from NKGEML414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.75) by lhreml707-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.199) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 09:28:51 +0000
Received: from NKGEML512-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.181]) by nkgeml414-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Thu, 7 Jan 2016 17:28:41 +0800
From: "Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL)" <anil.sn@huawei.com>
To: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Request for Comments from working group : Packet Loss Measurement for SFC
Thread-Index: AdFJLckvWK4t9oWBTHy1Sq1MCcr3uA==
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 09:28:41 +0000
Message-ID: <327562D94EA7BF428CD805F338C31EF06C08AB94@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.18.213.92]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_327562D94EA7BF428CD805F338C31EF06C08AB94nkgeml512mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020202.568E2FD4.00D6, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.7.181, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: de59dce3ce25177ac0fe6d5259649a4b
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/Cw4vVD5WIQUojQwLUQCtzvIoMaA>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 08:09:11 -0800
Cc: Vinod Kumar S 70786 <v70786@notesmail.huawei.com.cn>, Gaurav agrawal <gaurav.agrawal@huawei.com>
Subject: [sfc] Request for Comments from working group : Packet Loss Measurement for SFC
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 09:28:56 -0000
Hi All,
Please provide your valuable comments for below new draft
Name: draft-agv-sfc-packet-loss-measurement
Revision: 00
Title: Packet Loss Measurement for SFC
Document date: 2015-12-11
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 17
URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-agv-sfc-packet-loss-measurement-00.txt
Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-agv-sfc-packet-loss-measurement/
Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-agv-sfc-packet-loss-measurement-00
Abstract:
Service provider service level agreements (SLAs) depend on the
capability to measure and monitor performance metrics for packet
loss.
The common reasons for packet drop are Link Congestion, Device
(Router/Switch/Firewall/etc.) Performance, Software issues (bugs) on
a network device, Faulty Hardware or Cabling and Service Function
processing errors.
Packet Loss Measurement capability also provides operators with
greater visibility into the performance characteristics of their
networks, thereby facilitating planning, troubleshooting, and network
performance evaluation.
This document specifies best possible efficient and accurate
mechanism for passive packet loss measurement for Service Function
Chains (SFCs) for a SFC network domain.
Thanks & Regards
Anil S N
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send" - Jon Postel
- [sfc] Request for Comments from working group : P… Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL)
- [sfc] Request for Comments from working group : P… Gaurav agrawal