[sfc] Request for Comments from working group : Packet Loss Measurement for SFC
Gaurav agrawal <gaurav.agrawal@huawei.com> Wed, 13 January 2016 07:14 UTC
Return-Path: <gaurav.agrawal@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83CC91A8F41 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 23:14:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v4aQLPrlJot2 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 23:14:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 683AC1A8F37 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 23:14:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CGT32477; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 07:13:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LHREML701-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.93) by lhreml401-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.240) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 07:13:57 +0000
Received: from SZXEMI402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.75.34) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.93) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 07:13:56 +0000
Received: from SZXEMI502-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.54]) by SZXEMI402-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.83.65.54]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:13:42 +0800
From: Gaurav agrawal <gaurav.agrawal@huawei.com>
To: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Request for Comments from working group : Packet Loss Measurement for SFC
Thread-Index: AdFJLckvWK4t9oWBTHy1Sq1MCcr3uAEpBAGg
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 07:13:41 +0000
Message-ID: <2F2059F256F9B24F82EAC5EE47F446C6B01BA73B@szxemi502-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <327562D94EA7BF428CD805F338C31EF06C08AB94@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <327562D94EA7BF428CD805F338C31EF06C08AB94@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.18.250.69]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2F2059F256F9B24F82EAC5EE47F446C6B01BA73Bszxemi502mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020204.5695F936.0109, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.5.54, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 2125693daeece85f0044804b9332ac20
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/Dpe653OCC9YMJHZPOartaPqr71M>
Cc: Vinod Kumar S 70786 <v70786@notesmail.huawei.com.cn>, "Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL)" <anil.sn@huawei.com>
Subject: [sfc] Request for Comments from working group : Packet Loss Measurement for SFC
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 07:14:04 -0000
Hi All,
Please provide your valuable comments for below new draft
Name: draft-agv-sfc-packet-loss-measurement
Revision: 00
Title: Packet Loss Measurement for SFC
Document date: 2015-12-11
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 17
URL: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-agv-sfc-packet-loss-measurement-00.txt
Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-agv-sfc-packet-loss-measurement/
Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-agv-sfc-packet-loss-measurement-00
Abstract:
Service provider service level agreements (SLAs) depend on the
capability to measure and monitor performance metrics for packet
loss.
The common reasons for packet drop are Link Congestion, Device
(Router/Switch/Firewall/etc.) Performance, Software issues (bugs) on
a network device, Faulty Hardware or Cabling and Service Function
processing errors.
Packet Loss Measurement capability also provides operators with
greater visibility into the performance characteristics of their
networks, thereby facilitating planning, troubleshooting, and network
performance evaluation.
This document specifies best possible efficient and accurate
mechanism for passive packet loss measurement for Service Function
Chains (SFCs) for a SFC network domain.
Thanks & Regards
Gaurav Agrawal
- [sfc] Request for Comments from working group : P… Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL)
- [sfc] Request for Comments from working group : P… Gaurav agrawal