[sfc] Submission of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv-04.txt

wei.yuehua@zte.com.cn Tue, 05 January 2021 02:28 UTC

Return-Path: <wei.yuehua@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA36F3A0D38 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 18:28:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.916
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.916 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zKpre4WthTLr for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 18:28:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxde.zte.com.cn (mxde.zte.com.cn [209.9.37.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8704B3A0D32 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 18:28:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mse-eu.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.35.13.51]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTPS id 2E508F4DB5AB4667CECF for <sfc@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:28:37 +0800 (CST)
Received: from dgapp02.zte.com.cn ([10.35.13.17]) by mse-eu.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 1052SX5x057257 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:28:33 +0800 (GMT-8) (envelope-from wei.yuehua@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (dgapp02[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid1; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:28:34 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 10:28:34 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afa5ff3ced2c0f870b1
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <202101051028348005635@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <9e4f630b-c298-c9ca-883b-efe75a081e18@joelhalpern.com>
References: 202005211105230895521@zte.com.cn, 9e4f630b-c298-c9ca-883b-efe75a081e18@joelhalpern.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: wei.yuehua@zte.com.cn
To: sfc@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-eu.zte.com.cn 1052SX5x057257
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/S5cb9X8q1KOXpkmvxW3WdWnBkn4>
Subject: [sfc] Submission of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv-04.txt
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 02:28:43 -0000

Dear chairs and SFCers,


I uploaded ver04 of “Network Service Header Metadata Type 2 Variable-Length Context Headers” draft.


I updated the draft according to the comments received from the SFC mailing list.






Your comments are always welcome and helpful.






And I would like to ask the WG for the consideration of the WGLC.


Thank you!


------


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.This draft is a work item of the Service Function Chaining WG of the IETF.        Title           : Network Service Header Metadata Type 2 Variable-Length Context Headers        Authors         : Yuehua (Corona) Wei                          Uri Elzur                          Sumandra Majee                          Carlos Pignataro    Filename        : draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv-04.txt    Pages           : 13    Date            : 2021-01-04Abstract:   This draft describes Network Service Header (NSH) Metadata (MD) Type   2 variable-length context headers that can be used within a service   function path.The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv/There are also htmlized versions available at:https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv-04https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv-04A diff from the previous version is available at:https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv-04Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submissionuntil the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/_______________________________________________sfc mailing listsfc@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc










Yuehua Wei




Best Regards,


M: +86 13851460269 E: wei.yuehua@zte.com.cn










原始邮件



发件人:JoelM.Halpern
收件人:Carlos Pignataro (cpignata);
抄送人:sfc@ietf.org;
日 期 :2020年05月27日 23:40
主 题 :Re: [sfc] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv-03.txt


Thank you for your extensive work on this Carlos.

Working group...   Does anyone else have comments?  This is another 
milestone we need to get done.

Yours,
Joel

On 5/27/2020 10:33 AM, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) wrote:
> Dear Wei,
> 
> Thanks for addressing the vast majority of my comments from two full 
> reviews, and incorporating all my textual suggestions.
> 
> Some still remain:
> 
> 1.  s/byte/octet/g —> there are still 4 instances of “byte”.
> 
> 2. Content Type
> 
> 4.3.  Content Type
> 
> I’d recommend removing this one. It does not seem to be adequately defined.
> 
> 3. Note ID
> 
>                       Figure 6: Ingress Network Node ID
> 
> Why is the length fixed to 8? I understand a 32-bit number can be a most 
> common Node ID, but what if a 128-bit number wants to be used?
> 
> I’d allow either of two lengths.
> 
> 4. Flow ID
> 
> 4.6.  Flow ID
> 
>     Flow ID provides a representation of the flow.  Akin, but not
>     identical to the usage described in [RFC6437].
> 
> 
> This still needs to be more appropriately defined. I would replace:
> 
>     Flow ID provides a representation of the flow.  Akin, but not
>     identical to the usage described in [RFC6437].
> 
> With at least
> 
>     The Flow ID provides a field in the NSH MD Type 2 to label
>     packets belonging to the same flow.  Absence of this field, or
>     a value of zero denotes that packets have not been labeled.
> 
> 
> 
> 5. IANA
> 
>     This document defines the following new values (Table 1)in the
>     Network Service Header (NSH) metadata context Type registry:
> 
> 
> There’s a space missing in the first line.
> 
> More importantly though, I would add two Experimentation values in Table 
> 1. I would also reserve the value of 0x00.
> 
> 
> 6. IANA Citation.
> 
> I think the URI for IANA should be without the file part:
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/nsh/#optional-variable-length-metadata-types
> 
> 
> Lastly, here is some of the text proposed for some section descriptions:
> 
> Forwarding Context
> 
>     The forwarding context used for segregation and forwarding scope can
>     Take several forms depending on the network environment. For example,
> VXLAN/VXLAN-GPE VNID, VRF identification, and VLAN. This context
> header carries this network-based forwarding context.
> 
> Tenant Identifier
> 
>     Tenant identification is often used for segregation within a multi-
>     tenant environment.  Orchestration system-generated tenant IDs are an
>     example of such data. This context header carries both the format and
>     value of the Tenant identifier.
> 
> Content Type
> 
> // Remove
> // I believe this needs further thinking on the namespace fo Content 
> Types, could even be draft-penno-sfc-appid-05
> 
> Ingress Network Node Information
> 
>     This context header identifies the ingress network node.
> 
> Ingress Network Interface Information
> 
>     This context header identifies the ingress network interface.
> 
> Flow ID
> 
>     The Flow ID provides a field in the NSH MD Type 2 to label
>     packets belonging to the same flow.  Absence of this field, or
>     a value of zero denotes that packets have not been labeled.
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Carlos.
> 
> 
>> 2020/05/20 午後11:05、wei.yuehua@zte.com.cn 
>> <mailto:wei.yuehua@zte.com.cn>のメール:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I just uploaded a new version of NSH metadata 2 variable-length 
>> context headers.
>>
>> The updates resolved the comments received from the mailing list.
>>
>> One important technical modification is splitting of the Ingress 
>> Network context header to two context headers (in 4.4 and 4.5) which 
>> is proposed by Carlos, Med and Greg.
>>
>> Please keep reviewing and give your comments.
>>
>> <https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv-03.txt>
>>
>> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv-03..txt 
>> <https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv-03.txt>
>>
>>
>> In addition,  I would as the  WG to consider changing the length 
>> of Tenant Identifier context header ( in 4.2) to "var", so that TT and 
>> IANA sub-registry are not needed.
>>
>>
>> Thank you for your kind support.
>>
>>
>> *Best Regards,*
>> *魏月华 Corona Wei*
>>
>> *ZTE Corporation*
>>
>> M: +86 13851460269 E: wei.yuehua@zte.com.cn <mailto:wei.yuehua@zte.com.cn>
>>
>>
>> 原始邮件
>> *发件人:*internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> 
>> <internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org>>
>> *收件人:*i-d-announce@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org> 
>> <i-d-announce@ietf.org <mailto:i-d-announce@ietf.org>>;
>> *抄送人:*sfc@ietf.org <mailto:sfc@ietf.org> <sfc@ietf.org 
>> <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>>;
>> *日 期 :*2020年05月21日 08:40
>> *主 题 :**[sfc] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv-03.txt*
>>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the Service Function Chaining WG of the IETF.
>>
>>         Title           : Network Service Header Metadata Type 2 Variable-Length Context Headers
>>         Authors         : Yuehua (Corona) Wei
>>                           Uri Elzur
>>                           Sumandra Majee
>>     Filename        : draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv-03.txt
>>     Pages           : 12
>>     Date            : 2020-05-20
>>
>> Abstract:
>>    This draft describes Network Service Header (NSH) Metadata (MD) Type
>>    2 variable-length context headers that can be used within a service
>>    function path.
>>
>>
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv/
>>
>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv-03
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv-03
>>
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv-03
>>
>>
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sfc mailing list
>> sfc@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sfc mailing list
>> sfc@ietf.org <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sfc mailing list
> sfc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
> 

_______________________________________________
sfc mailing list
sfc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc