IETF Logo Mail Archive

[sfc] Regarding draft-eastlake-sfc-nsh-ecn-support adoption call

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Wed, 23 January 2019 23:14 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82FF2130F63 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:14:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NRjOvk7wT1DN for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:14:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailb2.tigertech.net (mailb2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.154]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7817130F62 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:14:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43lLhM3k5kzFqNt for <sfc@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:14:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1548285251; bh=9TWQTQ1dvi6Y/JNga8hzA9DvzIeggC7MO/cQkFKXivw=; h=To:From:Subject:Date:From; b=Gk1tHdTrTpJPbC1bnPWXmUIFv792TX23GChllZPkN7Xo2HNtiPLeJtbwHURCz8Xmj HEDza5ZgqmOJxY5530SjbYDcHQowsdsHcvw4q7jjZAJjq7Igln+owYx7GdewYzjvoQ TCZNI0UTLuPycaVIwZmTqxn++pZZAw+MXHw9L8GA=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at b2.tigertech.net
Received: from Joels-MacBook-Pro.local (209-255-163-147.ip.mcleodusa.net [209.255.163.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 43lLhM0c24zFpr9 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:14:10 -0800 (PST)
To: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <ddd62bd9-cf50-afb4-69a9-5a16c192cd00@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:14:10 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/ThKxQNfe_oFawjWvS-bHeV15u60>
Subject: [sfc] Regarding draft-eastlake-sfc-nsh-ecn-support adoption call
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 23:14:14 -0000

While the time for the call has completed, I would like to see the 
current discussion resolve before judging the adoption as chair (with Jim).
As a corollary, if anyone who has not spoken up has an opinion about the 
adoption, it is still VERY helpful if you speak up.  Please provide 
motivation for your response.

If things do not resolve clearly on their own, the chairs will (as is 
required) reach a determination anyway, but WG clarity is preferred.

Thank you,
Joel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email