IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sfc] Regarding draft-eastlake-sfc-nsh-ecn-support adoption call

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Mon, 28 January 2019 03:58 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 654D2130F0F for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 19:58:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0LC6JysGVS1Y for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 19:58:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com (mail-lj1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9078C12872C for <sfc@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 19:57:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id k15-v6so12950874ljc.8 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 19:57:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=j1xCc8C1tvvlfHfwsz+T9kcJNJT29rnkJb9A0ISAN28=; b=IloUaQ7OdA2MlM7SKYDrdIbq19U08Uaij5sX8CHehHsRXPHWzhFtfcs3LceelFlf6a F974AqB+vP63x5fs5wGU83m2OJLtSQeAbwcTeOP6Frs/mvCJ3f4TklkhL1ggB1AzciIE anmgez6bvuY8iHXPrs0uczJ8Ogt3UyTtv5ja/5JgMyG0gq1J7xCTcVmfnV5VYPJyp7/N bW8wue7HQ4I5toDUi19tA82rZpoWdlGqobeiyOcUCgNQGYetIVShU4b3S/tJr9i79luK kHWGehW3POdW8rnvxc+nM8J4/Egljkjp+JMpZOapmENtg4oV+DngD3zJJM7pmTEV3nZd s9cw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=j1xCc8C1tvvlfHfwsz+T9kcJNJT29rnkJb9A0ISAN28=; b=i+f/ul99JuQGo7bni2b92r7/TCaRe61KFB+EhQlt4x90DRnGkdlNk+a845DZwstf8+ n816yAuAYMekqObdww0kUAErxexIQKENObJHasm0ug70dxpaNOD2d/aYz+/xAJ79D+Kf PU9NkHYDt/CeRYiQpfSXCtNRQbjGzJjVA6GZ2rzhWaq+ukg/BRREGLlVpxINoijQAypc oBw0PuOXQt1TOExPs76a5vSydHlKdVU+52x+bsfoiYFLH5bqwBz9gI/IC0CUn4W/YLvO 5ucliAAKSUX1dgVqupwze9lpD0n9NIxbr/bZVy1x6e7iGc3/Y3xEANiacCqBoSGQQupe W5Ig==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuYZAlyN3NH/c6u4nGmlRA9VnT2PRodJJ69xQ6flz8S/1cLSnrcC llJo8sZ9qf04t6pJiAiDwG52dCfpG+r2jUvuexVi1fmXEXI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IaCK6ZGzRd1DDDCzQnSmwuQv6LWrMjdOLpki6KN8DnmHXhvIhD0YZLk3c6+2IAVhtunhnC3hx+IZ4KBWXknwLM=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8446:: with SMTP id u6-v6mr4065523ljh.74.1548647877519; Sun, 27 Jan 2019 19:57:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <ddd62bd9-cf50-afb4-69a9-5a16c192cd00@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <ddd62bd9-cf50-afb4-69a9-5a16c192cd00@joelhalpern.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 11:57:47 +0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmXZZOjh5-jrQ6MdbB1+bZibbsEJGuEqNmHma6Ci272waA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009f2ecc05807cae82"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/ruW2tSekzvV6IzBK10Y-GKtLTw0>
Subject: Re: [sfc] Regarding draft-eastlake-sfc-nsh-ecn-support adoption call
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2019 03:58:03 -0000

Hi,
the problem presented in this draft is real, the document is well-written,
and thus I support the adoption. I also concur with the proposal Loa have
made on the other thread related to WG AP for this draft - summarize the
discussion, comments received during the WG AP as To-Do list for the WG.

Regards,
Greg

On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 7:14 AM Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:

> While the time for the call has completed, I would like to see the
> current discussion resolve before judging the adoption as chair (with Jim).
> As a corollary, if anyone who has not spoken up has an opinion about the
> adoption, it is still VERY helpful if you speak up.  Please provide
> motivation for your response.
>
> If things do not resolve clearly on their own, the chairs will (as is
> required) reach a determination anyway, but WG clarity is preferred.
>
> Thank you,
> Joel
>
> _______________________________________________
> sfc mailing list
> sfc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email