Re: [sfc] Figures in draft-quinn-sfc-arch-05
"Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com> Thu, 29 May 2014 17:43 UTC
Return-Path: <jheitz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD331A048A for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 May 2014 10:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.151
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.151 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h8QD5dslr1uh for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 May 2014 10:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BD701A0449 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 May 2014 10:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=24502; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1401385389; x=1402594989; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=3fYDggdf3NylpNtSf9k6Lz2kPRaDFfSA9X7sSh0P2CQ=; b=Uw9QnaAN6ihUOCcRu46CBXafUgIauHjv8mXOwROp7qehb5p38L4jJNfu hTEDzOA13W63mv6Ef2y//sdK1W99xpsvnQtPbetoFXtbKoJuxbMkJpQF5 atmSSu/OJBzhn46w31jeEBnyraB2cemqxEy5zuT570XWReMJB+29W0Spx w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjEFAHVxh1OtJA2M/2dsb2JhbABZgkJFUljCNgGBDRZ0giUBAQEEJwZMEAIBCBEEAQELFgcHMhQJCAEBBAENBQiIOtdXF44hMQYBgyuBFQStHoM4gi8
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.98,935,1392163200"; d="scan'208,217";a="328937537"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 29 May 2014 17:43:02 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com [173.37.183.83]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s4THh2oH026529 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 29 May 2014 17:43:02 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.121]) by xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([173.37.183.83]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Thu, 29 May 2014 12:43:01 -0500
From: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>
To: Eric Gray <eric.gray@ericsson.com>, Joel Halpern <joel.halpern@ericsson.com>, "Paul Quinn (paulq)" <paulq@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: Figures in draft-quinn-sfc-arch-05
Thread-Index: Ac97S9R6mfocA+1iTpKXBfVlibSBggAGJh5A
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 17:43:01 +0000
Message-ID: <075DE01702BBC249BE1357EFD20DCFE556E2EC@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com>
References: <48E1A67CB9CA044EADFEAB87D814BFF632AD0443@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <48E1A67CB9CA044EADFEAB87D814BFF632AD0443@eusaamb107.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [128.107.165.107]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_075DE01702BBC249BE1357EFD20DCFE556E2ECxmbalnx02ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/hVN8EiVMPj1JU3W7l5ksr0N-QoQ
Cc: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sfc] Figures in draft-quinn-sfc-arch-05
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 17:43:16 -0000
You could turn the whole picture right by 90 degrees. If you don't like top to bottom instead of left to right, make a note that it's in landscape. --Jakob From: sfc [mailto:sfc-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Eric Gray Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2014 8:31 AM To: Joel Halpern; Paul Quinn (paulq) Cc: sfc@ietf.org Subject: [sfc] Figures in draft-quinn-sfc-arch-05 Paul/Joel, Pretty sure that Figures 5 and 6 don't actually fit the width expected for an Internet Draft (Figure 5 is more than 80 characters wide and Figure 6 is wider still). Depending on how a reader tries to read the draft, this can turn complicated illustrations into a _real_ fun time. :) Also, I am unsure what the figures are trying to convey with some of "dotted lines" crossing the service functions. If the intent is to show that a service function is a virtual instance hosted by some network device, perhaps this will be better shown in a separate figure and this aspect of Figures 5 and 6 can be eliminated? I would suggest replacing Figure 5 with a figure along the lines of: source +-----+ +-----+ | +-->| sf2 +--+ +-->| sf4 +--+ | | | | | | | | | | +------+--+ +-----+ +-->+-----+--+ +-----+ +->+-----+ | | sf1 | +-----+ | sf3 | +-----+ | sf5 | +->| +----->| sf2 +----->| |----->| sf4 +---->| |-+ | | | | | | | | | | | +------+--+ +-----+ +-->+-----+--+ +-----+ +->+-----+ | | +-----+ | | +-----+ | | +-->| sf2 +--+ +-->| sf4 +--+ +----+ | | | | | +-----+ +-----+ V destination Figure 5: Load Balancing (67 characters?) Similarly, I would suggest replacing Figure 6 with a figure along the lines of: source | +-----+-+ +-----+-+ +---+ +-->| sf2 |-|+ +-->| sf4 |-|+ | +---|-->| | || +------>| | || | +------+|---+ +-----+ |+-->+-----+|---+ +-----+ |+-->+-----+ | | sf1 || +-----+ +--->| sf3 || +-----+ +--->| sf5 | +-->| +|------>| sf2 |+---->| ||------>| sf4 |+---->| |--+ | | || +---->| |-+ | || +---->| |-+ | | | | +------+|-|-+ +-----+ |+-->+-----+|-|-+ +-----+ |+-->+-----+ | | | | | +-----+ || | | | +-----+ || | | +------++ | +-->| sf2 |-|+ +-----++ | +-->| sf4 |-|+ +-----+ | | | sf1' | | +-->| | +--->| sf3'| | +-->| | +--->| sf5'| | +-->| +--+ | +-----+----->| |--+ | +-----+----->| |--+ | | | | | | | | | +------+----+ +-----+----+ +-----+ | | +--------+ | V destination Figure 6: Load Balancing and HA (72 characters?) In both cases, the figure has all the same connection complexity (fixed up in a few places), but seems to be less busy. -- Eric
- [sfc] Figures in draft-quinn-sfc-arch-05 Eric Gray
- Re: [sfc] Figures in draft-quinn-sfc-arch-05 Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [sfc] Figures in draft-quinn-sfc-arch-05 Eric Gray
- Re: [sfc] Figures in draft-quinn-sfc-arch-05 Lucy yong
- Re: [sfc] Figures in draft-quinn-sfc-arch-05 Linda Dunbar
- Re: [sfc] Figures in draft-quinn-sfc-arch-05 Eric Gray
- Re: [sfc] Figures in draft-quinn-sfc-arch-05 Eric Gray
- Re: [sfc] Figures in draft-quinn-sfc-arch-05 Linda Dunbar
- Re: [sfc] Figures in draft-quinn-sfc-arch-05 Lucy yong
- Re: [sfc] Figures in draft-quinn-sfc-arch-05 Eric Gray
- Re: [sfc] Figures in draft-quinn-sfc-arch-05 Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [sfc] Figures in draft-quinn-sfc-arch-05 Eric Gray
- [sfc] Specifying chains of network functions [Re:… Sevil Mehraghdam
- Re: [sfc] Specifying chains of network functions … Dave Dolson
- Re: [sfc] Specifying chains of network functions … Sevil Mehraghdam