IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

"Shwetha Bhandari (shwethab)" <shwethab@cisco.com> Thu, 10 May 2018 00:48 UTC

Return-Path: <shwethab@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1040612E3AE; Wed, 9 May 2018 17:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.508
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.508 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id leWwCVGuyjnw; Wed, 9 May 2018 17:48:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFFB71200A0; Wed, 9 May 2018 17:48:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9491; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1525913299; x=1527122899; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=Rmm0hB1xCz0XzWtiHF/74DGmU8p8BXI940rg200zQwE=; b=lo9FbnvNosGcjbEq32iwjhsOoYfLRg7nbk73m1SuAaWzVCwulnWot+zA Cuu4bAxJX4uVWYDHbk2OkdHSra8BHUYj7NCAf4ZEWwOFRbNwWMl+PXTEu wEc4AIDcrYltoviZAAQB+JrO8XGjGVOBsBMuxNiAdli2lo8o0Um6NQ5dD k=;
X-Files: smime.p7s : 1976
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ABBACilfNa/5JdJa1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJNdmEXYygKg2WUcoMIjjaEdIF4CAMjg0iBAQIjgkohNRcBAgEBAQEBAQJsHAyFKQYdBlYQAgEGAjsHAgICMCUCBAENBQ6DFQKBfw+OVJtBghyIR4I5CgWIJYFUP4EygmiDEQIDAYE5gyMwgiQCmCwIAoNCgVRPiGiBNYNgh06JSYZfAhETAYEkAR4DM4FScBU7KgGCGIJIiEiFPm+QDIEYAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,383,1520899200"; d="p7s'?scan'208,217";a="391126593"
Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 May 2018 00:48:18 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-018.cisco.com (xch-aln-018.cisco.com [173.36.7.28]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w4A0mIPA018792 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 10 May 2018 00:48:18 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-008.cisco.com (173.36.7.18) by XCH-ALN-018.cisco.com (173.36.7.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 9 May 2018 19:48:17 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-008.cisco.com ([173.36.7.18]) by XCH-ALN-008.cisco.com ([173.36.7.18]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Wed, 9 May 2018 19:48:17 -0500
From: "Shwetha Bhandari (shwethab)" <shwethab@cisco.com>
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>, Service Function Chaining IETF list <sfc@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-brockners-proof-of-transit@ietf.org" <draft-brockners-proof-of-transit@ietf.org>, "sfc-chairs@ietf.org" <sfc-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
Thread-Index: AQHT5f7YhVkyPAj40ESuebqhLx1PTKQmF94AgAHruAA=
Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 00:48:17 +0000
Message-ID: <A44B272B-CBEB-46E5-AB2B-1843CA0A0741@cisco.com>
References: <152569607848.1439.13053030504229319467.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <3A3D7846-A8D0-4D46-A873-5D1663DC82DD@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <3A3D7846-A8D0-4D46-A873-5D1663DC82DD@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1a.0.160910
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.65.94.42]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha256"; boundary="B_3608777893_859627685"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/spmvZasOUxKmeUdEaKCrgBoDnLs>
Subject: Re: [sfc] The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 00:48:21 -0000

I support the adoption of this draft as SFC WG document, as a co-author.

 

Thanks,

Shwetha




On 5/7/18, 5:57 PM, "IETF Secretariat" <ietf-secretariat-reply@ietf.org> wrote:

 

    

    The SFC WG has placed draft-brockners-proof-of-transit in state

    Call For Adoption By WG Issued (entered by Joel Halpern)

    

    The document is available at

    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-brockners-proof-of-transit/

    

    Comment:

    As discussed in London, and requested by the document authors, this is a two

    week call for adoption for this document. Reminder: the question is not

    whether this is done, but rather whether this is a good start on work the

    working group would like to advance.

    

    Please speak up.  Silence is NOT consent.

    Given the long list of authors, the chairs particularly need to hear from

    non-authors.

    

    Yours,

    Joel (& Jim)

    

    PS: The issue of there being too many authors will be dealt with separately. 

    That is not an obstacle to adoption, merely an annoyance to the chairs.

   

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email