[Sframe] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-sframe-enc-07: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-sframe-enc-07: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sframe-enc/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for the work done in this I-D. It is *really* well-written and I love
the neat SVG graphics!  Also a good idea to have test data.

While I am not familiar at all about MLS, I wonder whether only using E bits of
the epoch in section 5.2 does not open a window for replay attack? Should there
be some guidance for the minimum amount of E bits ?

Thanks as well to Suresh Krishnan for his int-dir review at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-sframe-enc-07-intdir-telechat-krishnan-2024-03-29/
and I have read Richard's reply.

Nits:

- be consistent for "hop-by-hop" or "hop by hop"
- expand RTX (and possibly FEC) at first use
- perhaps define 'frame' (I understood it like a MPEG frame but could be wrong)