IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Sframe] SFRame Next Steps (was Re: [dispatch] SFrame proposed WG charter)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 30 July 2020 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90FD43A0E47; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 14:58:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.411
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.411 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.267, MAY_BE_FORGED=1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ywKuVsaY6_Yj; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 14:58:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DADD63A0E21; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 14:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bens-macbook.lan (mta-70-120-123-175.stx.rr.com [70.120.123.175] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 06ULw4Qa011935 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 30 Jul 2020 16:58:05 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1596146286; bh=WbcxxDVmDSJQtk0ap0eZgenBJUtcI1U7c6glKL0G+O8=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=WtJAOLr8dnNGuo5cPSrxzA3M+3OmaDkoIsfuzBAAQJ65UFO8+CPIFaAI3ExBIGdAd JFLcJv615Hw7i2EoU3GM2usRgrn35VKel9TnA8aRMb4Ed+F3AimR4T0UJCFBFkVP44 NSc+U92gE63u2kpsycnUx24q3yMJDJd56+SZazfE=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host mta-70-120-123-175.stx.rr.com [70.120.123.175] (may be forged) claimed to be bens-macbook.lan
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Message-Id: <E2072219-1B6E-4444-A39C-287842783DBF@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9EDC629D-1798-4740-8BA1-1A258EB0B13C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 16:57:57 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAHo7dC91bvRHiYuRT63uJ=HeuFU9L7XXqTcG+za5xi_BbQ0G2w@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: sframe@ietf.org, Emad Omara <emadomara=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
To: Dispatch WG <dispatch@ietf.org>
References: <CAHo7dC91bvRHiYuRT63uJ=HeuFU9L7XXqTcG+za5xi_BbQ0G2w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sframe/lWdvRqSfutbHdJcAyiYzqiHP3g8>
Subject: [Sframe] SFRame Next Steps (was Re: [dispatch] SFrame proposed WG charter)
X-BeenThere: sframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <sframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sframe/>
List-Post: <mailto:sframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sframe>, <mailto:sframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 21:58:16 -0000

Hi everyone,

We had a good discussion on SFrame in the dispatch meeting, and a lot of interest in progressing it. The chairs would love it if we can get some discussion of the proposed charter (below) now, while it’s still fresh in people’s minds. If we don’t see feedback to the contrary within a couple of weeks (let’s call that 14 Aug), we will hand it over to the ART ADs.

Thanks!

Ben.

> On Jul 27, 2020, at 12:34 PM, Emad Omara <emadomara=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi dispatch,
> 
> Following up on the discussion we had this morning in IETF 108 dispatch session about SFrame <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-omara-sframe-00>, it seems there is enough interest to form a focused WG for this work. 
> 
> Richard Barnes proposed this charter <https://docs.google.com/document/d/10rG8nAR0U6cBBPffzXnLaPPYL4uzxYViAvgiSezoa7o/edit?usp=sharing> for the WG. Please take a look and feel free to comment on the doc directly and propose other changes as well.
> 
> Thanks
> Emad
> _______________________________________________
> dispatch mailing list
> dispatch@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email