[sidr] minutes note consensus on several topics
Sandra Murphy <sandra.murphy@parsons.com> Thu, 04 September 2014 16:31 UTC
Return-Path: <sandra.murphy@parsons.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51FC11A03B5 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 09:31:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.465
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.465 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ciYy1Kg7cHoD for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 09:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from walnut.tislabs.com (walnut.tislabs.com [192.94.214.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76D8E1A0380 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 09:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nova.tislabs.com (unknown [10.66.1.77]) by walnut.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B98F928B0017; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:31:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by nova.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85BD31F8032; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 12:31:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sandra Murphy <sandra.murphy@parsons.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 12:31:36 -0400
Message-Id: <9CC235E3-CB3A-48FE-BEEE-0D9565B2A8B2@parsons.com>
To: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/02EW8GPILsPXHYVicTaWtY1UPUU
Cc: Sandra Murphy <sandra.murphy@parsons.com>
Subject: [sidr] minutes note consensus on several topics
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 16:31:40 -0000
The minutes note consensus in the meeting on several topics. I'm attempting to capture them here.
The mailing list is always the final word on consensus. If you object to any of the following, you should speak on list now!
If I've missed something noted in the minutes, you should speak on the list now!
If you think there was consensus on a topic not noted in the minutes - see previous message about the deadline for corrections.
In the discussion of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol:
consensus to remove origin validation
check from this document and add text explaining the oddly appearing
case of OV invalid, BGPSEC path authentic/valid.
Discussion has not converged <consensus that there was no consensus on signature choice>
In the discussion of draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration:
1) What status should this document be?
Concensus appeared to be the same status as BGPSEC
2) Should this document be merged into BGPSEC-Protocol
Concensus appeared to be not to merge
3) Should this document "Update" BGPSEC-Protocol
Concensus appeared to be that an update header is not needed if both
In the discussion of Router Keying Communication of cert to CA:
Concensus <sic> appeared to be that one ASN per router certificate is
sufficient.
--Sandy
- [sidr] minutes note consensus on several topics Sandra Murphy
- Re: [sidr] minutes note consensus on several topi… Stephen Kent