Re: [sidr] minutes note consensus on several topics

[Stephen Kent <[e-mail]>]

Sandy,

> The minutes note consensus in the meeting on several topics.  I'm attempting to capture them here.
>
> The mailing list is always the final word on consensus.  If you object to any of the following, you should speak on list now!
>
> If I've missed something noted in the minutes, you should speak on the list now!
>
> If you think there was consensus on a topic not noted in the minutes - see previous message about the deadline for corrections.
>
> In the discussion of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol:
>
> consensus to remove origin validation
> check from this document and add text explaining the oddly appearing
> case of OV invalid, BGPSEC path authentic/valid.
>
> Discussion has not converged <consensus that there was no consensus on signature choice>
>
> In the discussion of draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration:
>
>      1) What status should this document be?
>         Concensus appeared to be the same status as BGPSEC
concur
>         
>      2) Should this document be merged into BGPSEC-Protocol
>         Concensus appeared to be not to merge
yes.
>         
>      3) Should this document "Update" BGPSEC-Protocol
>         Concensus appeared to be that an update header is not needed if both
missing text at the end?
>
> In the discussion of Router Keying Communication of cert to CA:
>
> Concensus <sic> appeared to be that one ASN per router certificate is
> sufficient.
agreed.

Steve