Re: [sidr] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-06

Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Wed, 02 October 2013 15:06 UTC

Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF1021F89A6; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 08:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.299, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jOA1PlgBNVli; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 08:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.0.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31EF121F91B7; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 08:03:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp89-089-218.bbn.com ([128.89.89.218]:51574) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1VRNxk-000O8a-KM; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 11:03:40 -0400
Message-ID: <524C35CC.1030501@bbn.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 11:03:40 -0400
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
References: <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712025DBB6FDA@MX15A.corp.emc.com> <5249BE21.4060702@bbn.com> <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712025DBB7B41@MX15A.corp.emc.com> <524B3998.20009@bbn.com> <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712025DCE1852@MX15A.corp.emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712025DCE1852@MX15A.corp.emc.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010200040303030002040207"
Cc: "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "General Area Review Team (gen-art@ietf.org)" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-06
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 15:06:36 -0000

David,

> Steve,
>
> I think the modified introduction text suffices to connect the PATHSEC 
> and BGPsec terms, but I don't think that referring to the SIDR WG 
> charter for the PATHSEC goals is reasonable -- an RFC is an archive 
> document, whereas a WG charter is not.
>
The revised intro text now paraphrases the text from the SIDR charter that
describes the path security goals.

Steve