IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-06

"Black, David" <david.black@emc.com> Wed, 02 October 2013 19:17 UTC

Return-Path: <david.black@emc.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100B821F9FBA; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 12:17:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id euffcUSVarYD; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 12:17:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailuogwhop.emc.com (mailuogwhop.emc.com [168.159.213.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BFE321E8087; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 12:01:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from maildlpprd02.lss.emc.com (maildlpprd02.lss.emc.com [10.253.24.34]) by mailuogwprd03.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id r92J1j38023009 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Oct 2013 15:01:48 -0400
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd03.lss.emc.com r92J1j38023009
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emc.com; s=jan2013; t=1380740508; bh=X7lduZ7wpQR/3+Pi+YVVUGVR1Vg=; h=From:To:CC:Date:Subject:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=HhrXdYw/98o8dwoHanI7sKb/ktp1bpjYBhFW4uat+hSJI6YzRCqZkXCeQViA53oSZ 6P4NZhnSFhVVPWLymDH+AZnZ7Pljpo51U4uIWtwJrtQUiuO37aRIGlEk+9hM7dGZoP 8S0c6CHI7CEynKH0MgUC0hDyjoK0nQk3Vg502wQ8=
X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd03.lss.emc.com r92J1j38023009
Received: from mailusrhubprd52.lss.emc.com (mailusrhubprd52.lss.emc.com [10.106.48.25]) by maildlpprd02.lss.emc.com (RSA Interceptor); Wed, 2 Oct 2013 15:01:29 -0400
Received: from mxhub20.corp.emc.com (mxhub20.corp.emc.com [10.254.93.49]) by mailusrhubprd52.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id r92J1Qd8019701 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 2 Oct 2013 15:01:27 -0400
Received: from mx15a.corp.emc.com ([169.254.1.46]) by mxhub20.corp.emc.com ([10.254.93.49]) with mapi; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 15:01:26 -0400
From: "Black, David" <david.black@emc.com>
To: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 15:01:25 -0400
Thread-Topic: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-06
Thread-Index: Ac6/gKKlpXrFq8WgQde2122jwIv/AAAIRtdQ
Message-ID: <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712025DCE1A00@MX15A.corp.emc.com>
References: <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712025DBB6FDA@MX15A.corp.emc.com> <5249BE21.4060702@bbn.com> <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712025DBB7B41@MX15A.corp.emc.com> <524B3998.20009@bbn.com> <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712025DCE1852@MX15A.corp.emc.com> <524C35CC.1030501@bbn.com>
In-Reply-To: <524C35CC.1030501@bbn.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE712025DCE1A00MX15Acorpemcc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Sentrion-Hostname: mailusrhubprd52.lss.emc.com
X-EMM-GWVC: 1
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-EMM-McAfeeVC: 1
Cc: "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "General Area Review Team (gen-art@ietf.org)" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-06
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 19:17:52 -0000

Sounds good - I look forward to seeing the revised draft.

Thanks,
--David

From: Stephen Kent [mailto:kent@bbn.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 11:04 AM
To: Black, David
Cc: achi@cs.unc.edu; General Area Review Team (gen-art@ietf.org); stbryant@cisco.com; ietf@ietf.org; sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-threats-06

David,


Steve,

I think the modified introduction text suffices to connect the PATHSEC and BGPsec terms, but I don't think that referring to the SIDR WG charter for the PATHSEC goals is reasonable - an RFC is an archive document, whereas a WG charter is not.
The revised intro text now paraphrases the text from the SIDR charter that
describes the path security goals.

Steve

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email