Re: [sidr] BCP for implementing RPKI?

"George, Wes E [NTK]" <Wesley.E.George@sprint.com> Mon, 04 April 2011 12:50 UTC

Return-Path: <Wesley.E.George@sprint.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99A03A69EE for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 05:50:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.155
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.155 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.556, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2GNExMTrXvDE for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 05:50:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.185]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECFB13A69EA for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 05:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail76-ch1-R.bigfish.com (216.32.181.170) by CH1EHSOBE003.bigfish.com (10.43.70.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.8; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 12:52:22 +0000
Received: from mail76-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail76-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA06708358; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 12:52:22 +0000 (UTC)
X-SpamScore: -34
X-BigFish: VS-34(zz9371P542Nzz1202hzz1033IL8275dhz2fh2a8h668h839h34h61h)
X-Spam-TCS-SCL: 0:0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPVD:NLI; H:pdaasdm2.corp.sprint.com; RD:smtpda2.sprint.com; EFVD:NLI
Received: from mail76-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail76-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 1301921541646081_23856; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 12:52:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CH1EHSMHS008.bigfish.com (snatpool1.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.253]) by mail76-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D454B5004E; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 12:52:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdaasdm2.corp.sprint.com (144.229.32.57) by CH1EHSMHS008.bigfish.com (10.43.70.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.8; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 12:52:17 +0000
Received: from PDAWEH05.ad.sprint.com (PDAWEH05.corp.sprint.com [144.226.110.92]) by pdaasdm2.corp.sprint.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.0.5/Sentrion-MTA-4.0.5) with ESMTP id p34CqGjR031287 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 4 Apr 2011 07:52:16 -0500
Received: from PDAWEH04.ad.sprint.com (144.226.111.59) by PDAWEH05.ad.sprint.com (144.226.110.92) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 07:52:16 -0500
Received: from PLSWM12A.ad.sprint.com ([fe80::dd81:e8a1:cd6b:78f]) by PDAWEH04.ad.sprint.com ([2002:90e2:6f3b::90e2:6f3b]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 07:52:16 -0500
From: "George, Wes E [NTK]" <Wesley.E.George@sprint.com>
To: "carlos@lacnic.net" <carlos@lacnic.net>
Thread-Topic: [sidr] BCP for implementing RPKI?
Thread-Index: AcvyXbuB9it8+ktmTaaJ/hQha6BlcAALjKkAAA67jgA=
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 12:52:15 +0000
Message-ID: <54E900DC635DAB4DB7A6D799B3C4CD8E10C6AFCE@PLSWM12A.ad.sprint.com>
References: <54E900DC635DAB4DB7A6D799B3C4CD8E10C6AE16@PLSWM12A.ad.sprint.com> <BANLkTikA+Pp+Dmr01_760rksG24x1gT8xQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikA+Pp+Dmr01_760rksG24x1gT8xQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.229.76.112]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg="SHA1"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0034_01CBF2A5.9759EE10"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: sprint.com
Cc: "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] BCP for implementing RPKI?
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 12:50:47 -0000

-----Original Message-----
From: Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo [mailto:carlosm3011@gmail.com] 
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2011 8:49 PM
To: George, Wes E [NTK]
Cc: sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] BCP for implementing RPKI?

That said, I believe documenting best practices is always a good idea.
Do you think a new, different document is needed or that practices you want documented can be included in the CPS documents ?

regards

Carlos
[WEG] I'm open to either. In looking at the current use cases doc: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-usecases-01 it seems
to be more about the BGP side of the use cases rather than the RPKI, so either there needs to be a separate doc or this needs a new
section specifically devoted to the use cases I've been referring to.