Re: [sidr] RPKI and private keys (was RE: Interim Meeting Draft Agenda: 04-30-2012 (April 30, 2012)))

"Osterweil, Eric" <eosterweil@verisign.com> Sat, 05 May 2012 01:38 UTC

Return-Path: <eosterweil@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97E921F84DF for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2012 18:38:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.019
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.580, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5UzeXzK7WuCm for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2012 18:38:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod6og117.obsmtp.com (exprod6og117.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1DD521F84DE for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 May 2012 18:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from peregrine.verisign.com ([216.168.239.74]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob117.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT6SEdbT+gcbpFL/dUQZDWV6w9XayMQCo@postini.com; Fri, 04 May 2012 18:38:06 PDT
Received: from brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.173.152.206]) by peregrine.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id q451bsFp031203 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 4 May 2012 21:37:54 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by brn1wnexcas02.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Fri, 4 May 2012 21:37:54 -0400
From: "Osterweil, Eric" <eosterweil@verisign.com>
To: "'morrowc@ops-netman.net'" <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
Thread-Topic: [sidr] RPKI and private keys (was RE: Interim Meeting Draft Agenda: 04-30-2012 (April 30, 2012)))
Thread-Index: AQHNKkSJz7TI33mXqEag9uIgDcAF15a6YCwkgABLHAD//7+Qog==
Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 01:37:53 +0000
Message-ID: <CE0C4A314044C843AEE900875D90D54E10847F@BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FA48240.9060405@ops-netman.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.170.13.175]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "'sidr-chairs@tools.ietf.org'" <sidr-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "'Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com'" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>, "'sidr-ads@tools.ietf.org'" <sidr-ads@tools.ietf.org>, "'sidr@ietf.org'" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] RPKI and private keys (was RE: Interim Meeting Draft Agenda: 04-30-2012 (April 30, 2012)))
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 01:38:16 -0000

Hey Chris,

Yeah, I read that. I know there's a tendency for some people to want to talk about bath houses on this list, but I was going to pass on that.

As for draft-ymbk-bgpsec-rtr-rekeying-00.txt, that draft just points out the inadequacies of either approach and that there is no good solution. My take is that this is indicative of a misalignment between a given architecture and implicit requirements. Sometimes you can't patch the holes in a leaky ship, you need to reassess the requirements. I think the evidence illustrates that this is the case here.

Eric 


----- Original Message -----
From: Chris Morrow [mailto:morrowc@ops-netman.net]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 09:28 PM
To: Osterweil, Eric
Cc: 'Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com' <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>; 'danny@tcb.net' <danny@tcb.net>; 'morrowc.lists@gmail.com' <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>; 'sidr@ietf.org' <sidr@ietf.org>; 'sidr-chairs@tools.ietf.org' <sidr-chairs@tools.ietf.org>; 'sidr-ads@tools.ietf.org' <sidr-ads@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] RPKI and private keys (was RE: Interim Meeting Draft Agenda: 04-30-2012 (April 30, 2012)))



On 05/04/2012 08:59 PM, Osterweil, Eric wrote:

> His point is NOT addressed by any draft in the wg (since you asked).

read randy's mentioned draft?