Re: [sidr] transparent route-servers question(s)
Elisa Jasinska <elisa@llnw.com> Wed, 16 November 2011 07:14 UTC
Return-Path: <elisa@llnw.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146C611E81E7 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:14:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.646
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.646 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WJrKaSXwIFxF for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:14:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.llnw.net (cmail.phx3.llnw.net [69.28.132.12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8346211E81E3 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:14:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 17520 invoked by uid 1008); 16 Nov 2011 00:14:22 -0700
Received: from 61-220-70-183.hinet-ip.hinet.net (HELO ?192.168.101.30?) (ejasinska@limelightnetworks.com@61.220.70.183) by mail.llnw.net with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 16 Nov 2011 00:14:22 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Elisa Jasinska <elisa@llnw.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2aa7xc2nw.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:14:20 +0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <00ABE7DA-65B9-4D9E-B4C4-0948351CCB31@llnw.com>
References: <CAL9jLabvXjYcNtMr1kc25FXvwzyG9R=9GvvhwSu4aFE++oReAg@mail.gmail.com> <m2aa7xc2nw.wl%randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: Elisa Jasinska <elisa@llnw.com>, sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] transparent route-servers question(s)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 07:14:25 -0000
On Nov 15, 2011, at 14:36 , Randy Bush wrote: >> "Some route servers don't have an ASN, some use a private-asn" > > i have had a small visit by a clue bat. if two RSs use AS 65666, > where is the cert for that AS? oops! Indeed! Using a private ANS for route server operations is neither recommended nor encouraged in the IX community, although it is not strictly forbidden either. Especially small IXPs (read: a switch in the corner) operated by an organization not involved into routing otherwise and therefore not even in possession of an AS number, might fall back on this option. I don't recall an example out of the top of my head, will do some digging and report back. Thanks Elisa -- Elisa Jasinska Limelight Networks e elisa@llnw.com p +1 602 850 5753 m +31 6 23234891
- [sidr] transparent route-servers question(s) Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] transparent route-servers question(s) Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] transparent route-servers question(s) Elisa Jasinska