IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] working group adoption poll for draft-huston-sidr-rfc6490-bis

Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Wed, 12 February 2014 15:33 UTC

Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C9A1A0342 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 07:33:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.728
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.728 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tBJ3oEwSGfZr for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 07:33:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.1.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 503951A08B8 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 07:33:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp89-089-218.bbn.com ([128.89.89.218]:52986) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1WDbo6-0007hF-7F for sidr@ietf.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:33:02 -0500
Message-ID: <52FB942D.4070404@bbn.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:33:01 -0500
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
CC: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F6940A90C5@HSV-MB001.huntsville.ads.sparta.com> <m2ha8a8cb1.wl%randy@psg.com> <1B60AC34-6528-4505-B1C7-D92CA7E128D7@ripe.net> <52FA67FB.9040601@bbn.com> <m2iosltfkd.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2iosltfkd.wl%randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [sidr] working group adoption poll for draft-huston-sidr-rfc6490-bis
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:33:05 -0000

Randy,
>> I'm puzzled by the references to a "third party" above. Why would an
>> entity acting as a TA not want to control all of the locations where
>> it's TAL identifies as places from which to acquire the cert?
> outsourcing.  think of it as rendition.
>
> randy
>
Ah, so a TA kidnaps a cert, blindfolds it, pours water over its 
signature, and forces
the cert to disclose the private key used to sign it.

Got it.

No problem.

Steve

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email