IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] working group adoption poll for draft-huston-sidr-rfc6490-bis

Andy Newton <andy@arin.net> Mon, 10 February 2014 19:15 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@arin.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCD11A0473 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:15:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qbE26YCNXe5C for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:15:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp2.arin.net (smtp2.arin.net [IPv6:2001:500:4:13::32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D27591A03A5 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:15:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by smtp2.arin.net (Postfix, from userid 323) id 93E56213605; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:15:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from CHAXCH05.corp.arin.net (chaxch05.corp.arin.net [192.149.252.94]) by smtp2.arin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25682213552; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:15:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from CHAXCH04.corp.arin.net (10.1.30.19) by CHAXCH05.corp.arin.net (192.149.252.94) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.342.3; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:15:52 -0500
Received: from CHAXCH01.corp.arin.net ([169.254.1.174]) by CHAXCH04.corp.arin.net ([10.1.30.19]) with mapi id 14.02.0347.000; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:15:52 -0500
From: Andy Newton <andy@arin.net>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net>
Thread-Topic: [sidr] working group adoption poll for draft-huston-sidr-rfc6490-bis
Thread-Index: AQHPJpSD2gYCV5MqI0iRUmAUu87+DA==
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:15:52 +0000
Message-ID: <CF1E8E92.2C5EA%andy@arin.net>
In-Reply-To: <m27g93671u.wl%randy@psg.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.7.130812
x-originating-ip: [10.1.30.36]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <1240E0FE4981EF4EA0F4E5115128AD4D@corp.arin.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] working group adoption poll for draft-huston-sidr-rfc6490-bis
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:15:55 -0000

On 2/9/14, 9:22 PM, "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com> wrote:

>>But if the format is open to change, then I would feel more for a
>>key=value style, or dare I say even json.. this is parsed by the
>>machines after all.
>
>the assumption that json is a universally, or even widely, implemented
>format is not well founded.  let's not get carried away into lala land.
>we're just trying to allow multiple uris in a tal.

I agree with Randy that we don¹t need to get carried away (though JSON is
widely implemented). The current format works for me.

And I support the adoption of this work item.

-andy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email