Re: [sidr] draft-ietf-bgpsec-protocol-05
"Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com> Fri, 07 September 2012 23:04 UTC
Return-Path: <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3BC21F8427 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:04:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.261
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.261 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.338, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dbh6DQ9HioWy for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:04:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from M4.sparta.com (M4.sparta.com [157.185.61.2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8131E21F8422 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 16:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Beta5.sparta.com (beta5.sparta.com [157.185.63.21]) by M4.sparta.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q87N4nct022019; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:04:49 -0500
Received: from Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com ([157.185.80.107]) by Beta5.sparta.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q87N4n6v018101; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 18:04:49 -0500
Received: from HERMES.columbia.ads.sparta.com ([fe80::e4a8:a383:2128:c0e5]) by Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com ([fe80::e4a8:a383:2128:c0e5%21]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.002; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 19:05:25 -0400
From: "Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
To: Matt Lepinski <mlepinski@bbn.com>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sidr] draft-ietf-bgpsec-protocol-05
Thread-Index: AQHNjTg920cTNwkYrkOywNOdMHFjjJd/fuUagAABG6I=
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 23:05:24 +0000
Message-ID: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F696D8@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
References: <504A5A34.1070201@bbn.com>, <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F696C5@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
In-Reply-To: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F696C5@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.185.63.118]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [sidr] draft-ietf-bgpsec-protocol-05
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 23:04:58 -0000
That's: --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair ________________________________________ From: sidr-bounces@ietf.org [sidr-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Murphy, Sandra [Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 7:02 PM To: Matt Lepinski; sidr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [sidr] draft-ietf-bgpsec-protocol-05 Thanks to Matt for an impressive amount of work. I encourage the working group to look at this draft right away. This will be a major focus of our interim meeting on 29 Sep. --Sandy ________________________________________ From: sidr-bounces@ietf.org [sidr-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Matt Lepinski [mlepinski@bbn.com] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 4:33 PM To: sidr@ietf.org Subject: [sidr] draft-ietf-bgpsec-protocol-05 I have submitted an -05 version of the BGPSEC protocol specification. This includes changes that we discussed at the meeting in Vancouver (including clarity on duplicate updates, as well as clarity that confederations MAY choose not to verify signatures from other members of the confederation). Additionally, I fleshed out the algorithm in Section 4.4 for converting from a BGPSEC_Path_Signatures attribute to an AS_PATH attribute. (And in general improved the text on how information in the BGPSEC_Path_Signatures attribute should be used in place of AS_PATH information whenever AS_PATH information is required.) Finally, I fixed a bug in the confederation solution (Section 4.3) that was discussed on the SIDR list shortly after the Vancouver meeting. The confederation solution now better mirrors the way confederations are handled in BGP-4 (non-BGPSEC). Oh, and I fixed a couple of stupid typos in the Bibliography, I am sure there are still a few other such typos sitting around in various sections, but I believe all of the outstanding technical issues have been addressed. - Matt Lepinski _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
- [sidr] draft-ietf-bgpsec-protocol-05 Matt Lepinski
- Re: [sidr] draft-ietf-bgpsec-protocol-05 Murphy, Sandra
- Re: [sidr] draft-ietf-bgpsec-protocol-05 Murphy, Sandra