[sidr] draft-ietf-bgpsec-protocol-05
Matt Lepinski <mlepinski@bbn.com> Fri, 07 September 2012 20:33 UTC
Return-Path: <mlepinski@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87A921F84C9 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3StWj9lrYfeM for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:33:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.0.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7436B21F84C2 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:33:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.bbn.com ([128.33.0.48]:33816) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <mlepinski@bbn.com>) id 1TA5FK-0004Pf-AU for sidr@ietf.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:33:46 -0400
Received: from [128.89.254.168] by mail.bbn.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <mlepinski@bbn.com>) id 1TA5FK-0001jH-6t for sidr@ietf.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:33:46 -0400
Message-ID: <504A5A34.1070201@bbn.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 16:33:56 -0400
From: Matt Lepinski <mlepinski@bbn.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [sidr] draft-ietf-bgpsec-protocol-05
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 20:33:50 -0000
I have submitted an -05 version of the BGPSEC protocol specification. This includes changes that we discussed at the meeting in Vancouver (including clarity on duplicate updates, as well as clarity that confederations MAY choose not to verify signatures from other members of the confederation). Additionally, I fleshed out the algorithm in Section 4.4 for converting from a BGPSEC_Path_Signatures attribute to an AS_PATH attribute. (And in general improved the text on how information in the BGPSEC_Path_Signatures attribute should be used in place of AS_PATH information whenever AS_PATH information is required.) Finally, I fixed a bug in the confederation solution (Section 4.3) that was discussed on the SIDR list shortly after the Vancouver meeting. The confederation solution now better mirrors the way confederations are handled in BGP-4 (non-BGPSEC). Oh, and I fixed a couple of stupid typos in the Bibliography, I am sure there are still a few other such typos sitting around in various sections, but I believe all of the outstanding technical issues have been addressed. - Matt Lepinski
- [sidr] draft-ietf-bgpsec-protocol-05 Matt Lepinski
- Re: [sidr] draft-ietf-bgpsec-protocol-05 Murphy, Sandra
- Re: [sidr] draft-ietf-bgpsec-protocol-05 Murphy, Sandra