IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] Date and type of the next (end of June/early July) interim

"Roque Gagliano (rogaglia)" <rogaglia@cisco.com> Thu, 31 May 2012 13:38 UTC

Return-Path: <rogaglia@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2079221F869A for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 May 2012 06:38:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GFiR3fwk5Cqa for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 May 2012 06:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEDF21F8675 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 May 2012 06:38:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=rogaglia@cisco.com; l=8583; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1338471536; x=1339681136; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=Fiws1TuMtkxKS8/1Mb2KqRDXu92fMV7xOQMZ2kPdhFU=; b=h6PuoWkLv5pwMUiHv42I3Jer6dETOCW+TwWJjgGMnAWoI5wRWJRsFok1 2I/q4H2PuD6/Ec3xEYAWD5cMScUhqSGAHhLN6Jbl8cCNMofet2PjSlB8c PzzG9dVToUn9YGFjHL2gZRaHgSGv6kr6JPM6A5N3b8+zLFaAqqE5DH4bm g=;
X-Files: smime.p7s : 4389
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAGhzx0+tJV2b/2dsb2JhbABEtAuBB4IYAQEBAwEBAQEPAVsLBQsCAQgRBAEBLwIlCx0IAgQOBQ4Uh2QFC5kNn2EEixGEZmADjjWBHYVGjg2BZoJg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.75,692,1330905600"; d="p7s'?scan'208"; a="88299025"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 31 May 2012 13:38:55 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com [173.36.12.86]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4VDctGR017785 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 31 May 2012 13:38:55 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([169.254.1.61]) by xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com ([173.36.12.86]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Thu, 31 May 2012 08:38:55 -0500
From: "Roque Gagliano (rogaglia)" <rogaglia@cisco.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Thread-Topic: [sidr] Date and type of the next (end of June/early July) interim
Thread-Index: AQHNPzK499bpI6QRqUKxoHGwyWcDdg==
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 13:38:54 +0000
Message-ID: <303ED97F-C935-45B7-A624-D74A746E4638@cisco.com>
References: <4FBFA992.8020107@isode.com> <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F12D2E@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
In-Reply-To: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F625F12D2E@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.147.19.47]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-6.800.1017-18938.006
x-tm-as-result: No--42.708400-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-191--612919618"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>, sidr wg <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Date and type of the next (end of June/early July) interim
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 13:38:57 -0000

Hi Alexey,

I would like to propose to have a test for a virtual-only meeting. 

I understand that we want to keep interims very dynamic in a whiteboard style. But, having participated remotely for a couple of hours in the previous meeting, this is very hard for remote participants (internal conversations, been able to jump into the flow, presenting, etc.)

So, having a virtual-only meeting will be different as you normally requires more preparation work and moderators needs to be more active to make sure we get the work done.

Roque




On May 30, 2012, at 11:07 PM, Murphy, Sandra wrote:

> Not many people  have commented on Alexey's message.
> 
> IETF process mandates that a face-face meeting be announced four week ahead, which is Friday 1 Jun, if we stay with face-face on 29 Jun.
> 
> The subsequent meeting was proposed for 27 Jul, so keep that in mind as well.
> 
> --Sandy
> ________________________________________
> From: sidr-bounces@ietf.org [sidr-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Alexey Melnikov [alexey.melnikov@isode.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 11:47 AM
> To: sidr wg
> Subject: [sidr] Date and type of the next (end of June/early July) interim
> 
> Dear WG members,
> The WG needs to decide about the date and type of the next interim
> (after June 6th). The earlier proposal stated June 29th. Are people
> happy with this date or do they want to propose an alternative? Note
> that we are more flexible this time, because this is not tied to any
> other industry event.
> 
> We also need to decide on whether this should be a physical interim with
> remote participants or fully virtual interim (e.g. everybody is using
> WebEx or something similar).
> 
> Please reply to this message, sending your comments to the mailing list
> or directly to chairs (sidr-chairs@tools.ietf.org).
> 
> Best Regards,
> Alexey, on behalf of SIDR chairs.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email