[sidr] updated route leaks drafts

"Sriram, Kotikalapudi" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov> Mon, 06 July 2015 12:47 UTC

Return-Path: <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CB51ACEC5; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 05:47:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L4kBb7AjPt6X; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 05:47:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0754.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::754]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10DFF1AD355; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 05:47:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from CY1PR09MB0793.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.163.43.143) by BLUPR09MB007.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.255.211.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.213.10; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 12:47:12 +0000
Received: from CY1PR09MB0793.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.43.143]) by CY1PR09MB0793.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.43.143]) with mapi id 15.01.0207.004; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 12:47:12 +0000
From: "Sriram, Kotikalapudi" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
To: "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>, GROW WG <grow@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: updated route leaks drafts
Thread-Index: AQHQt+WoFw0LQo2Ow0yBikApURO1rQ==
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 12:47:12 +0000
Message-ID: <CY1PR09MB0793F7CC65601B77F002D63F84930@CY1PR09MB0793.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: nist.gov; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
x-originating-ip: [129.6.223.194]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR09MB007; 5:5EQ1/gTClbzpBO+W+QlNuC/S2HEzXnk9IZLGMoeXkHzl6D3AMHMf8BtVTzKTZlh8msw9pmHRFHrSyc3391zX9OBp4RYFPJPTHfqSjP5Q/DYAqfb9RLbDgZ7PIfEwffa/Rx0TMnQlY6jSccg0HA8sUQ==; 24:KT5blJFKkxUzDPFqf0bu0Ak1M8Q9gHdqTykY2xpOq8KtUvro3DD628+N7ivTBZyHoSR/hEo3SNmwBzww9BWDMiqaGFC+bTTcuMtHYt8Xwmk=; 20:FqEKp+mqMXGh5Lv/qjldqq2R26djH6xhcgrpiHxs8+D7urrE8J8WYWB/AW/6bORNjlMF5VNMEaYN/GgTve10ng==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR09MB007;
blupr09mb007: X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RulesExecuted
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR09MB007297AF0AD626F42DF8E7684930@BLUPR09MB007.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:BLUPR09MB007; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR09MB007;
x-forefront-prvs: 06290ECA9D
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(479174004)(66066001)(2501003)(86362001)(62966003)(2656002)(77156002)(87936001)(46102003)(5002640100001)(5001770100001)(40100003)(92566002)(76576001)(102836002)(15975445007)(77096005)(2420400003)(122556002)(2900100001)(229853001)(7110500001)(5001960100002)(74316001)(107886002)(50986999)(19580395003)(106116001)(189998001)(54356999)(5003600100002)(33656002)(140573001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR09MB007; H:CY1PR09MB0793.namprd09.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nist.gov
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Jul 2015 12:47:12.0936 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2ab5d82f-d8fa-4797-a93e-054655c61dec
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR09MB007
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/JMugNbmIseyk_5dgJbkk_-7xVwc>
Subject: [sidr] updated route leaks drafts
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 12:47:31 -0000

I know many people on the SIDR and GROW lists also follow IDR.
But just in case you haven't already noticed,
we (the authors) have submitted a substantially updated -01 version 
of the route leaks solution draft in IDR:

https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sriram-idr-route-leak-detection-mitigation-01.txt 
 
WG adoption call request for this work is in progress in the IDR WG -- (6/25 to 7/9/2015):
 
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/current/msg14550.html 

You may like to review the document and the discussion taking place on the IDR list.
Also, comments in response to the call or about the draft in general would be helpful.

There is also an updated version (-02) of the GROW WG draft on route leaks definition:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-grow-route-leak-problem-definition-02 

Sriram