Re: [sidr] New Version Notification for draft-ymbk-sidr-transfer-00.txt

Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> Sun, 05 July 2015 15:19 UTC

Return-Path: <sandy@tislabs.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F423B1A8BAF for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 08:19:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.012
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ixaHSEYePjVU for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 08:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from walnut.tislabs.com (walnut.tislabs.com [192.94.214.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF5F71A8AFC for <sidr@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 08:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nova.tislabs.com (unknown [10.66.1.77]) by walnut.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F4D28B0041; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 11:19:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by nova.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692DA1F8035; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 11:19:34 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_89D6E665-D6FD-4E4E-BD74-F83107D5AEFF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <m27frn3qye.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 11:19:33 -0400
Message-Id: <87F5B607-2ECC-4C54-A8D8-D8CE5F587F07@tislabs.com>
References: <20150530231211.10362.50102.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <m2lhg33u84.wl%randy@psg.com> <556CF530.4010408@ops-netman.net> <m27frn3qye.wl%randy@psg.com>
To: "sidr@ietf.org list" <sidr@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/xw9-G49_NUjsYY5UzkyBLjXEglg>
Cc: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, "sidr-chairs@tools.ietf.org Chairs" <sidr-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
Subject: Re: [sidr] New Version Notification for draft-ymbk-sidr-transfer-00.txt
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 15:19:37 -0000

In November last year, a more detailed description of transfer was suggested as a means to move ahead with the validation-reconsidered discussion.  This draft is such a more detailed description.

(http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/91/slides/slides-91-sidr-0.pdf is you can't remember that far back.)

But there have been very few comments on this draft.  The hope is that this will give the wg the grounds for an informed opinion on "the need to alter the RPKI validation process along the lines of the 'validation reconsidered' draft", to quote the presentation.

Please, please, please.  Start discussion now.

Is this accurate from the standpoint of transfer activities?  from the standpoint of RPKI actions?

And the further question - does this help you to understand the validation reconsidered algorithm?

--Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair


On Jun 1, 2015, at 8:16 PM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:

>> Title: Resource Transfer in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure
> 
> this is a very rough first draft.  all folk who agreed to author have
> not even reviewed.  i published partly to get them to wake up and tell
> me how broken my understanding is.
> 
> randy