Re: [sidr] wg adoption call for draft-tbruijnzeels-sidr-validation-local-cache-02

I think we ought to have a document that describes how an RP can manage 
a local
cache, since we usually say that we expect RPs to do so. However, this 
document
seems to be a description of only one implementation's approach to local 
cache
management. I'd be more comfortable with a document that is co-authored by
the developers of the three major RP implementations.

Steve
> As noted in the minutes, the authors of draft-tbruijnzeels-sidr-validation-local-cache-02 request that the working group adopt this work as a wg work item.
>
> A working group adoption poll starts now and will end 14 days from now on 23 December.
>
> Please respond on the list to say whether you support adoption of this work as a working group work item AND whether you will participate in the discussion.
>
> Remember that working group consensus to adopt the work needs responses, not just absence of objection, so speak up.
>
> --Sandy, speaking as one of the wg co-chairs
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr