IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] wg adoption call for draft-tbruijnzeels-sidr-validation-local-cache-02

Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> Mon, 07 March 2016 21:37 UTC

Return-Path: <sandy@tislabs.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322AF1CDC0B for <sidr@ietfc.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 13:37:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.41]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lYYQ-Vyi-njc for <sidr@ietfc.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 13:37:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from walnut.tislabs.com (walnut.tislabs.com [192.94.214.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5340D1CDBFD for <sidr@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 13:37:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nova.tislabs.com (unknown [10.66.1.77]) by walnut.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88F628B003D; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 16:37:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by nova.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E611F801E; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 16:37:22 -0500 (EST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E7C412C5-87BC-4085-A7EA-4C53916752D9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <130D7372-428C-43D9-86D7-EC6A02F6E096@ripe.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 16:33:56 -0500
Message-Id: <89F5732A-E5CB-4E6C-9967-A26B20B8994D@tislabs.com>
References: <C5F46C82-299D-4DBB-BF6D-7B24FE3C330D@tislabs.com> <729C6843-EFDF-40E4-A89C-BB4904A41F0B@tislabs.com> <130D7372-428C-43D9-86D7-EC6A02F6E096@ripe.net>
To: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/hdqcDt8A9YwTHuUrupidIvv8lkE>
Cc: sidr <sidr@ietf.org>, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
Subject: Re: [sidr] wg adoption call for draft-tbruijnzeels-sidr-validation-local-cache-02
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 21:37:25 -0000

On Mar 4, 2016, at 5:19 AM, Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net> wrote:

> Hi Sandy,
> 
> Technical question. We plan to submit an update before the cut-off date - no major overhaul but we have some changes.
> 
> Can we just submit a new version as an official document, or should we just re-submit this one, and do the update in a week or two?
> 
> 

I see no benefit to your doing a two-step to get an update submitted.  And I know of no process in the submission tools that would check to see if the new wg draft was the same as the individual draft.

So one submission should work.

Let the chairs know if you experience problems.

—Sandy, speaking as one of the wg co-chairs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email