Re: [sidr] WG adoption of draft-reynolds-rpki-ltamgmt-01.txt

Sandra Murphy <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com> Fri, 22 October 2010 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <Sandra.Murphy@cobham.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F8C3A693C for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:46:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MgWFCEaABjBk for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from M4.sparta.com (M4.sparta.com [157.185.61.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80263A6899 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:46:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Beta5.sparta.com (beta5.sparta.com [157.185.63.21]) by M4.sparta.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id o9MHm6am013781 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:48:06 -0500
Received: from mailbin2.ads.sparta.com (mailbin.sparta.com [157.185.85.6]) by Beta5.sparta.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9MHm6E2032413 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:48:06 -0500
Received: from SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com ([74.202.225.34]) by mailbin2.ads.sparta.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:48:06 -0400
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:47:40 -0400
From: Sandra Murphy <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
To: sidr@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1009271742280.1784@SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1010221333350.836@SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1009271742280.1784@SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
X-X-Sender: sandy@mailbin.sparta.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Oct 2010 17:48:06.0628 (UTC) FILETIME=[487BE240:01CB7211]
Subject: Re: [sidr] WG adoption of draft-reynolds-rpki-ltamgmt-01.txt
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:46:35 -0000

The chairs see three positive responses to this call for adoption and no 
negative responses.

The chairs are satisfied that there is wg consensus to adopt this work.

The authors are requested to submit the -00 draft when the submission 
process permits.

--Sandy, co chair wimple on

On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, Sandra Murphy wrote:

> The wg chairs have received a request that the working group adopt the draft 
> "Local Trust Anchor Management for the Resource Public Key Infrastructure" 
> <draft-reynolds-rpki-ltamgmt-01.txt> as a wg work item.
>
> This material of this draft was presented at
>
> IETF 75 
> (http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/75/slides/sidr-3/sidr-3_files/v3_document.htm)
> IETF 76 (http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/76/slides/sidr-11.pdf)
> and IETF 77 
> (http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/77/slides/sidr-6/sidr-6_files/v3_document.htm)
>
> A draft was requested by the audience at IETF 75.  The -00 version was 
> submitted in Mar 2010 and wg adoption was requested.  Response to that 
> request did not indicate wg consensus - the responses were positive but there 
> were only three replies.
>
> A new version of the draft is available at
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-reynolds-rpki-ltamgmt-01.txt
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-reynolds-rpki-ltamgmt-01
>
> The authors request that the wg consider this new version again for wg 
> adoption.
>
> Recall that active support for adoption is necessary for the wg chairs to 
> judge acceptance as a working group work item, so silence works against 
> adoption. The wg chairs also want to know who would be willing to work on the 
> draft.  The wg chairs also want to know if you oppose adoption.
>
> Please respond to the list, giving your recommendation for or against 
> adoption of the draft as a wg work item as well as your intention to work on 
> the draft if adopted. The call for adoption will end in two weeks on 11 Oct 
> 2010.
>
> --Sandy, wg chair bowler on
>
>
>
>