Re: [sidr] WG adoption of draft-reynolds-rpki-ltamgmt-01.txt

Hi Sandra,

I support this document.

Doing a quick read, when mentioning SKI as a 40 bytes field, the author is sticking to SHA-1 to calculate it. I do not see why to impose the restriction here. 

Regards,
Roque

On Sep 28, 2010, at 12:03 AM, Sandra Murphy wrote:

> The wg chairs have received a request that the working group adopt the draft "Local Trust Anchor Management for the Resource Public Key Infrastructure" <draft-reynolds-rpki-ltamgmt-01.txt> as a wg work item.
> 
> This material of this draft was presented at
> 
> IETF 75 (http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/75/slides/sidr-3/sidr-3_files/v3_document.htm)
> IETF 76 (http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/76/slides/sidr-11.pdf)
> and IETF 77 (http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/77/slides/sidr-6/sidr-6_files/v3_document.htm)
> 
> A draft was requested by the audience at IETF 75.  The -00 version was submitted in Mar 2010 and wg adoption was requested.  Response to that request did not indicate wg consensus - the responses were positive but there were only three replies.
> 
> A new version of the draft is available at
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-reynolds-rpki-ltamgmt-01.txt
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-reynolds-rpki-ltamgmt-01
> 
> The authors request that the wg consider this new version again for wg adoption.
> 
> Recall that active support for adoption is necessary for the wg chairs to judge acceptance as a working group work item, so silence works against adoption. The wg chairs also want to know who would be willing to work on the draft.  The wg chairs also want to know if you oppose adoption.
> 
> Please respond to the list, giving your recommendation for or against adoption of the draft as a wg work item as well as your intention to work on the draft if adopted. The call for adoption will end in two weeks on 11 Oct 2010.
> 
> --Sandy, wg chair bowler on
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr