IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] revision to draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation

Rob Austein <sra@isc.org> Tue, 26 May 2009 21:55 UTC

Return-Path: <sra@hactrn.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559823A6C0F for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 May 2009 14:55:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id js2p0V9CLBYK for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 May 2009 14:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cyteen.hactrn.net (cyteen.hactrn.net [IPv6:2002:425c:4242:0:210:5aff:fe86:1f54]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707473A6B57 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 May 2009 14:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from thrintun.hactrn.net (thrintun.hactrn.net [IPv6:2002:425c:4242:0:219:d1ff:fe12:5d30]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "thrintun.hactrn.net", Issuer "Grunchweather Associates" (verified OK)) by cyteen.hactrn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B2D928450 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 May 2009 21:56:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from thrintun.hactrn.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by thrintun.hactrn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4712822809 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 May 2009 17:56:49 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 17:56:49 -0400
From: Rob Austein <sra@isc.org>
To: sidr@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <561CF52A-FFDE-409A-81B4-0A68F5C73718@apnic.net>
References: <561CF52A-FFDE-409A-81B4-0A68F5C73718@apnic.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-Id: <20090526215649.4712822809@thrintun.hactrn.net>
Subject: Re: [sidr] revision to draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 21:55:10 -0000

At Wed, 27 May 2009 06:39:12 +1000, Geoff Huston wrote:
> ...
> You, and WG members of course, can review the proposed revisions to
> the WG document that reflect what the authors believe is the WG's
> rough consensus position on this topic at
> draft-huston-sidr-roa-validation-01.txt

I've skimmed the new version and think this is a major improvement.
Thanks, guys!

Nit: there's a vestigial mention of BOAs at the start of section 2
(clearly just an editing oversight, given the other changes).

--Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email