[sidr] revision to draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation

Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> Tue, 26 May 2009 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <gih@apnic.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063EC3A6B43 for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 May 2009 13:37:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EkqawwxMlyyn for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 May 2009 13:37:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp.apnic.net (oregano.apnic.net [IPv6:2001:dc0:2001:a:4608::60]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC7733A67DD for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 May 2009 13:37:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:dc0:2001:10:217:f2ff:fec9:1b10] (unknown [IPv6:2001:dc0:2001:10:217:f2ff:fec9:1b10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by asmtp.apnic.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD46110068; Wed, 27 May 2009 06:39:12 +1000 (EST)
Message-Id: <561CF52A-FFDE-409A-81B4-0A68F5C73718@apnic.net>
From: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
To: Sandy Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3)
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 06:39:12 +1000
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3)
Cc: sidr@ietf.org
Subject: [sidr] revision to draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 20:37:35 -0000

Hi Sandy,

WG co-chair hat OFF.

Following the WG discussion on the topic of ROA validation at IETF 74  
the draft's authors gained the impression that the rough consensus  
position from the last SIDR WG meeting was to drop to drop the concept  
of BOAs and use only ROAs. The authors have prepared a revision to the  
WG document that reflects that understanding. However, the authors  
would like to confirm that impression with yourself as the relevant co- 
chair and with the WG, via this note, before submitting this document  
as draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation-02.txt. You, and WG members of  
course, can review the proposed revisions to the WG document that  
reflect what the authors believe is the WG's rough consensus position  
on this topic at draft-huston-sidr-roa-validation-01.txt

thanks,

  Geoff Huston & George Michaelson