IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WG adoption of draft-achi-rpki-signed-object-00.txt

Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net> Thu, 26 August 2010 23:26 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@ripe.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A603A6837 for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.131
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.131 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.827, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_DYNAMIC_HCC=4.295]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jRmSYe6C9WF7 for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:26:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from postgirl.ripe.net (postgirl.ipv6.ripe.net [IPv6:2001:610:240:11::c100:1342]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 540123A67F7 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Aug 2010 16:26:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dodo.ipv6.ripe.net ([2001:610:240:23::c100:1704] helo=dodo.ripe.net) by postgirl.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <tim@ripe.net>) id 1OolqG-0002u8-SK for sidr@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 01:26:50 +0200
Received: from timbru.vpn.ripe.net ([193.0.21.62] helo=215.11.dhcp.conference.apricot.net) by dodo.ripe.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <tim@ripe.net>) id 1OolqG-0001FI-Cb for sidr@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2010 01:26:44 +0200
Message-ID: <4C76F831.5010506@ripe.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:26:41 +1000
From: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sidr@ietf.org
References: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1008231021370.5884@SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1008231021370.5884@SMURPHY-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RIPE-Signature: 784d7acfe6559f2a0b602ec6519a071963b637fd8f4f27fc054c4ffcc433e8ee
X-RIPE-Spam-Level: --
X-RIPE-Signature: 784d7acfe6559f2a0b602ec6519a071963b637fd8f4f27fc054c4ffcc433e8ee
Subject: Re: [sidr] WG adoption of draft-achi-rpki-signed-object-00.txt
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:26:19 -0000

> Please respond to the list, giving your recommendation for or against
> adoption of the draft as a wg work item.

Support and agree with Rob Austein's comment. In our implementation we
are already using a generic CMS object for ROAs and Manifests, having a
dedicated draft helps making this stuff better testable in isolation.

Cheers
Tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email