Re: [sidr] WG adoption of draft-achi-rpki-signed-object-00.txt

Generally I support this too, but have a specific question: what's the 
intended future relation between this would-be-draft and the existing ROA 
draft? I mean, once we have a template, we should use that, even for the 
ROAs, right?

Robert

On 2010.08.23. 16:47, Sandra Murphy wrote:
> The working group chairs have received a request from the authors of
> draft-achi-rpki-signed-object-00.txt that the working group adopt this
> internet draft as a work item.
>
> This is the draft to which Matt Lepinski alluded in his message of 20 Aug
> 2010. As he notes, this draft is an extract of the common language from the
> ROA format and manifest documents that has to do with the CMS encapsulation
> for signed objects.
>
> Note that the draft from which the language was extracted are already
> working group work items. The work item represented by this new draft is the
> creation of an extract and a generic description.
>
> The draft is available at
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-achi-rpki-signed-object-00
>
> As always in a call for adoption:
>
> Recall that active support for adoption is necessary for the wg chairs to
> judge acceptance as a working group work item, so silence works against
> adoption. The wg chairs also want to know who would be willing to work on
> the draft.
>
> Please respond to the list, giving your recommendation for or against
> adoption of the draft as a wg work item.
>
> Because of the special circumstances of this draft, the call for adoption
> will be shorter than usual - 10 days, ending 1 Sept 2010.
>
> --Sandy, speaking as wg chair
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr