Re: [sidr] agenda for virtual meeting Mar 24

Was the WG consulted on scheduling this virtual meeting and I missed the message?

The first message I see on the matter is the announcement of the meeting on 3/7. I don't know about anyone else, but I'm traveling to Paris the day it's scheduled (actually ON the plane during the meeting), and based on a couple of messages in response to the general announcement (on ietf@ietf), I'm not the only one. My travel arrangements have been made for significantly more than 3 weeks, as are most people's when planning a trip to IETF. Virtual meetings don't need as much advance notice due to the fact that no one needs to travel to *attend* but scheduling conflicts do exist.

As far as I can tell, there was no attempt to determine the appropriateness of the date for this or the previous Interim with the WG prior to setting the date. I know of several folks who found out about it during NANOG and would have liked to attend, but couldn't rearrange their travel plans at the last minute.

In the future, I respectfully ask the chairs to solicit opinions on potential scheduling of interim meetings PRIOR to setting the date. I have no problem with there being a self-selecting core group of folks that make up a design team, but when they are working directly with the chairs to schedule supposedly official WG interim meetings without involving the WG until the dates are already set, we have a problem.

For that matter, I believe that this interim/virtual meeting should be rescheduled once an appropriate date can be determined based on consensus of the *entire* WG. Put up a doodle poll with some potential dates, publish it along with the goal of the meeting to sidr@ietf.org and let those interested in attending choose.

Thanks,

Wes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: sidr-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:sidr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Murphy, Sandra
> Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 10:49 PM
> To: sidr@ietf.org
> Cc: iesg-secretary@ietf.org
> Subject: [sidr] agenda for virtual meeting Mar 24
>
> Here is the agenda for the sidr virtual meeting on Sat 24 Mar 2012.
>
> UTC 0800-1030. Protocol spec
>     In depth protocol review, doc structure, forward path, etc.
>     draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-02
>     http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol
>
> UTC 1030-1230 Break
>
> UTC 1230-1330
>     draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops-15
>     draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-reqs-03
>     draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-04
>     http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops
>     http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-reqs
>     http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops
>     (if there is time, discussion of
>     draft-ymbk-bgpsec-rtr-rekeying-00
>     http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ymbk-bgpsec-rtr-rekeying
>     draft-rogaglia-sidr-bgpsec-rollover-00
>     http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-rogaglia-sidr-bgpsec-rollover-00)
>
>
> UTC 1330-1430 Alternate architectures
>     RPKI delivery and scaling
>
> UTC 1430-1600 pfx-validate
>     recent discussions on the sidr list.
>     draft-ietf-sidr-pfx-validate-04
>     http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-pfx-validate
>
> --Sandy, speaking as working group co-chair
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.