[sidr] BGPSec RFC status
Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Wed, 13 April 2016 18:17 UTC
Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63EEF12DE3A for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2nGD0r-ZfX2O for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:17:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.1.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F9F312DB60 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 11:17:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ssh.bbn.com ([192.1.122.15]:37572 helo=COMSEC.fios-router.home) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1aqPMC-000HIk-HW for sidr@ietf.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:17:40 -0400
To: sidr <sidr@ietf.org>
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Message-ID: <570E8D44.1080208@bbn.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 14:17:40 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/f6f66uCE4DJZVrdPBXqT1uamod0>
Subject: [sidr] BGPSec RFC status
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 18:17:43 -0000
I didn't attend the IETF meeting, but I did listen to the Wednesday SIDR session, at which the issue was raised as to whether the BGPSec RFC should be standards track or experimental. I believe standards track is the right approach here. This document has been viewed as standards track since we began work on it long ago. It is the successor to the origin validation standards, addressing the residual vulnerabilities that persist based on that use of the RPKI. From the perspective of promoting adoption it is critical that this remain a standards track document; router vendors will be unlikely to devote resources to design and implementation if BGPsec is labeled experimental. I agree that this is new technology, but I heard that we already have a couple of implementations already, and we may discourage others from continuing to work on BGPSec implementations if we downgrade the status of the RFC. The design has evolved to accommodate real-world routing deployment topics such as the role of IXPs and AS migration. In my long experience in the IETF experience, the level of attention to these an analogous details makes BGPsec a very solid candidate for standards track publication. Steve
- [sidr] BGPSec RFC status Stephen Kent
- Re: [sidr] BGPSec RFC status Russ Housley
- Re: [sidr] BGPSec RFC status Declan Ma
- Re: [sidr] BGPSec RFC status Geoff Huston
- Re: [sidr] BGPSec RFC status Russ White
- Re: [sidr] BGPSec RFC status Russ White
- Re: [sidr] BGPSec RFC status Randy Bush
- Re: [sidr] BGPSec RFC status Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] BGPSec RFC status Rob Austein
- Re: [sidr] BGPSec RFC status t.petch
- Re: [sidr] BGPSec RFC status John G. Scudder
- Re: [sidr] BGPSec RFC status Joel Jaeggli
- Re: [sidr] BGPSec RFC status Roque Gagliano (rogaglia)
- Re: [sidr] BGPSec RFC status Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [sidr] BGPSec RFC status Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] BGPSec RFC status Warren Kumari
- Re: [sidr] BGPSec RFC status Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] BGPSec RFC status Sharon Goldberg