IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] BGPSec RFC status

Declan Ma <madihello@icloud.com> Thu, 14 April 2016 05:14 UTC

Return-Path: <madihello@icloud.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5203C12D5BA for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 22:14:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L-7z2H9AB1ts for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 22:14:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pv33p07im-ztdg10151401.me.com (pv33p07im-ztdg10151401.me.com [17.142.253.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ADA212D1B1 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 22:14:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.219.38] (unknown [124.17.24.198]) by pv33p07im-ztdg10151401.me.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.36.0 64bit (built Sep 8 2015)) with ESMTPSA id <0O5L00BPEYKNQ310@pv33p07im-ztdg10151401.me.com> for sidr@ietf.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 05:14:56 +0000 (GMT)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2016-04-14_04:,, signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1510270003 definitions=main-1604140076
Content-type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Declan Ma <madihello@icloud.com>
In-reply-to: <BE65B202-367F-4888-BBDD-E642B4B875E9@vigilsec.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 13:14:46 +0800
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Message-id: <8F474262-AF65-4ACB-8622-1DD0837A3CB5@icloud.com>
References: <570E8D44.1080208@bbn.com> <BE65B202-367F-4888-BBDD-E642B4B875E9@vigilsec.com>
To: IETF SIDR <sidr@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/0MUvSUnLR0HMcbsMAwV2uXJTAM0>
Subject: Re: [sidr] BGPSec RFC status
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 05:14:59 -0000

I think BGPsec should be Standards Track.

ISPs and router vendors won’t take BGPsec seriously if it is published as an Experimental RFC.

We came a long way here from S-BGP and so much time and so many efforts by many have been spent on BGPsec. The community need some real experience.


Di

ZDNS

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email