IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] wg adoption call for draft-tbruijnzeels-sidr-delta-protocol-03

"Sriram, Kotikalapudi" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov> Sun, 18 January 2015 14:28 UTC

Return-Path: <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6251B29EE for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 06:28:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LdfVaH1_ywOD for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 06:28:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0115.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84BA51B29EF for <sidr@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 06:28:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DM2PR09MB0302.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (25.160.96.147) by DM2PR09MB0303.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (25.160.96.148) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.59.20; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 14:28:29 +0000
Received: from DM2PR09MB0302.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.96.147]) by DM2PR09MB0302.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([25.160.96.147]) with mapi id 15.01.0059.007; Sun, 18 Jan 2015 14:28:29 +0000
From: "Sriram, Kotikalapudi" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
To: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
Thread-Topic: [sidr] wg adoption call for draft-tbruijnzeels-sidr-delta-protocol-03
Thread-Index: AQHQMP+L1hUxvdtKu0+4xuxMg2KPNZzDHWCAgALPiv8=
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 14:28:28 +0000
Message-ID: <1421591307695.63452@nist.gov>
References: <EEBA5E04-EB38-4AE1-BB13-D87F836C2985@tislabs.com> <FCD088C8-49B3-4DAD-A462-D35E0E746D3C@arin.net>, <7A1259DD-3877-4B65-A880-85B0D5D79F2E@afrinic.net>
In-Reply-To: <7A1259DD-3877-4B65-A880-85B0D5D79F2E@afrinic.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [129.6.219.120]
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov;
x-dmarcaction-test: None
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(3005004);SRVR:DM2PR09MB0303;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DM2PR09MB0303;
x-forefront-prvs: 046060344D
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(189002)(199003)(97736003)(106116001)(86362001)(36756003)(19617315012)(230783001)(117636001)(19580395003)(106356001)(54356999)(105586002)(50986999)(76176999)(92566002)(64706001)(2656002)(77156002)(62966003)(110136001)(2900100001)(19627405001)(87936001)(15975445007)(102836002)(68736005)(66066001)(15395725005)(16236675004)(99286002)(101416001)(122556002)(46102003)(40100003)(2950100001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR09MB0303; H:DM2PR09MB0302.namprd09.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nist.gov does not designate permitted sender hosts)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_142159130769563452nistgov_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nist.gov
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 18 Jan 2015 14:28:28.1840 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2ab5d82f-d8fa-4797-a93e-054655c61dec
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM2PR09MB0303
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/hnth5EK0zEV5tI5ryDqBxUW4w9g>
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] wg adoption call for draft-tbruijnzeels-sidr-delta-protocol-03
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 14:28:34 -0000

I have read and I support adoption.


When authors spin a WG draft version (assuming it would be accepted as a WG draft),

it would be good if the following suggestions can be given consideration:


1. Include one short paragraph just to discuss key disadvantages of rsync and

how the delta protocol avoids or overcomes the same.


2. Possible to say something about the relevance of or comparison with

Aspera (since they make big performance improvement claims over rsync etc.)?

http://asperasoft.com/resources/benchmarks/

http://asperasoft.com/performance-calculator/


3. I am separately emailing the authors a marked up MS word copy of the document

with some other minor comments and pointing out some typos, etc.


Sriram

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email