IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-usecases-02.txt

Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org> Thu, 22 December 2011 23:41 UTC

Return-Path: <terry.manderson@icann.org>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817CA21F86A0 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:41:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w-ABmwcDPsFH for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:41:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org (expfe100-2.exc.icann.org [64.78.22.237]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1859221F84B2 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:41:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.232]) by EXPFE100-2.exc.icann.org ([64.78.22.237]) with mapi; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:41:44 -0800
From: Terry Manderson <terry.manderson@icann.org>
To: "Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>, Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:41:42 -0800
Thread-Topic: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-usecases-02.txt
Thread-Index: Acxt4oVbqqx666ZTSlCfUhKlXxFTtxSQ5bBpABIVMgAABW/rgAAAMtAAAA13yBMAEhm39Q==
Message-ID: <CB19FD56.2015E%terry.manderson@icann.org>
In-Reply-To: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F6062106@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: sidr wg <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-usecases-02.txt
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 23:41:45 -0000

> 
> and on 8 Sep, Terry
> (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg03305.html) replied:
> 
>> From time to time authors choose to use non rfc5737 address blocks as the
>> examples can't often be adequately described or remain uniform with the
>> documentation prefixes.
> 
> I was suggesting that the authors make the argument that the documentation
> prefixes are insufficient for this draft's purpose *in the draft* to avoid
> making the same argument as the document progresses.
> 

And that seems like a perfectly reasonable thing to do :-)

Cheers
Terry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email