Re: [Sidr] adoption of draft-huston-sidr-roa-validation-00.txt as a working group work item
Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Fri, 04 April 2008 20:53 UTC
Return-Path: <sidr-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: sidr-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-sidr-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2688E3A68D1; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 13:53:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75D983A69C2 for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 13:53:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id alhrfhV5STHR for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 13:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx11.bbn.com (mx11.bbn.com [128.33.0.80]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2E23A6884 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 13:53:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp89-089-071.bbn.com ([128.89.89.71]) by mx11.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1Jhsuy-0002UJ-5n; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:53:48 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240503c41c454d0ea0@[128.89.89.71]>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.64.0804040944180.3420@SANDYM-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.64.0804040944180.3420@SANDYM-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:52:31 -0400
To: Sandra Murphy <sandy@sparta.com>
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Cc: sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Sidr] adoption of draft-huston-sidr-roa-validation-00.txt as a working group work item
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: sidr-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: sidr-bounces@ietf.org
At 9:46 AM -0400 4/4/08, Sandra Murphy wrote: >This internet draft was presented at the sidr meeting in Philadelphia. >Please state whether you believe that this is appropriate to adopt as a >working group work item. > >If your response is positive, please also indicate whether you would >actively participate in commenting on this draft. > >ROA Validation > >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-huston-sidr-roa-validation-00.txt > I am in favor of SIDR adopting the ROA validation effort, either as a separate I-D or as part of th extant ROA syntax and semantics I-D. I will review the text in either case. Steve _______________________________________________ Sidr mailing list Sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
- [Sidr] adoption of draft-huston-sidr-roa-validati… Sandra Murphy
- Re: [Sidr] adoption of draft-huston-sidr-roa-vali… Stephen Kent
- Re: [Sidr] adoption of draft-huston-sidr-roa-vali… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Sidr] adoption of draft-huston-sidr-roa-vali… Danny McPherson