IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Sidr] ROA Validation, Repository Structure, and Bogon drafts

sandy@tislabs.com (Sandy Murphy) Thu, 29 May 2008 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <sidr-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: sidr-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-sidr-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C94128C2DC; Thu, 29 May 2008 11:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A3B3A69A0 for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 May 2008 11:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.185
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.185 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ErLoM9Oshzna for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 May 2008 11:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nutshell.tislabs.com (ns1.tislabs.com [192.94.214.100]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 721A33A6BDD for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 May 2008 11:23:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost) by nutshell.tislabs.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id m4TI2MS2021992 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 May 2008 14:02:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nodnsquery(10.66.1.30) by nutshell.tislabs.com via csmap (V6.0) id srcAAAKaa48Q; Thu, 29 May 08 14:02:22 -0400
Received: by pecan.tislabs.com (Postfix, from userid 2005) id 26C9C3F4A2; Thu, 29 May 2008 14:05:16 -0400 (EDT)
To: sidr@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20080529180516.26C9C3F4A2@pecan.tislabs.com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 14:05:16 -0400
From: sandy@tislabs.com
Cc: sandy@tislabs.com
Subject: [Sidr] ROA Validation, Repository Structure, and Bogon drafts
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: sidr-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: sidr-bounces@ietf.org

I am disappointed at the lack of response to the question of acceptance
of three drafts (ROA validation, repository structure, and bogons) from
the Philly meeting as wg items.  The questions went out to the list
in April.  Each draft got exactly one response.

In each case, the response was positive.  But that's hardly enough to be
judged "consensus".

It might be judged "apathy", though.

Please, people.  Respond.  Positively or negatively, we need to decide
whether the working group should adopt each topic as part of our work.

The messages you should respond to are:


http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg00401.html
(for draft-huston-sidr-bogons-01.txt - a new version has been
announced since, so the correct link is
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-huston-sidr-bogons-01.txt)


http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg00402.html
for draft-huston-sidr-repos-struct-01.txt 


http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg00403.html
for draft-huston-sidr-roa-validation-00.txt 

--Sandy
_______________________________________________
Sidr mailing list
Sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email