IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] replies needed quickly RE: possible additional meeting times

Eric Osterweil <eosterweil@verisign.com> Tue, 20 March 2012 13:13 UTC

Return-Path: <eosterweil@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE2C21F86F3 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 06:13:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.515
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.515 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.084, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1naNOD4yBYK3 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 06:13:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod6og114.obsmtp.com (exprod6og114.obsmtp.com [64.18.1.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4986221F867B for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 06:13:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from peregrine.verisign.com ([216.168.239.74]) (using TLSv1) by exprod6ob114.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT2iCb13y/LiJIxsNC7DUPsqNSn1d5ERn@postini.com; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 06:13:21 PDT
Received: from dul1wnexcn03.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (dul1wnexcn03.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com [10.170.12.113]) by peregrine.verisign.com (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id q2KDDIAO003403; Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:13:18 -0400
Received: from dul1eosterwe-m1.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([10.100.0.123]) by dul1wnexcn03.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:13:18 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Eric Osterweil <eosterweil@verisign.com>
In-Reply-To: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F60F6C88B2@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:13:17 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5224E362-A277-4C03-B943-6A9CCF796D01@verisign.com>
References: <24B20D14B2CD29478C8D5D6E9CBB29F60F6C88B2@Hermes.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
To: "Murphy, Sandra" <Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Mar 2012 13:13:18.0429 (UTC) FILETIME=[377DA0D0:01CD069B]
Cc: "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] replies needed quickly RE: possible additional meeting times
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 13:13:22 -0000

Friday is conflicted for me, but Monday is good.

Eric

On Mar 19, 2012, at 5:58 PM, Murphy, Sandra wrote:

> One important point.
> 
> The routing AD needs to know the decision by COB UTC time on Tuesday (tomorrow).
> 
> So replies are needed quickly.
> 
> --Sandy
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: sidr-bounces@ietf.org [sidr-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Murphy, Sandra [Sandra.Murphy@sparta.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 5:37 PM
> To: sidr@ietf.org
> Subject: [sidr] possible additional meeting times
> 
> The routing ADs have suggested that sidr could use the cancelled  EAI and/or
> the cancelled CODEC slot to make up for the cancelled virtual meeting.
> 
> EAI was to meet 1300-1500 Afternoon Session I on Monday March 26.
> CODEC was to meet 1120-1220 Afternoon Session I Friday March 30.
> 
> Please speak up as to whether either of these two spots would work.
> 
> --Sandy
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email