IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sidrops] WG Adoption call for draft-ymbk-sidrops-ov-clarify (10/4 to 10/19)

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 20 October 2017 02:38 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B02132EA7 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 19:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QdDA9dYJkVIz for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 19:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4280F132153 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 19:38:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1e5NCA-0001AW-O5; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 02:37:58 +0000
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 19:37:58 -0700
Message-ID: <m2vajailx5.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: George Michaelson <ggm@algebras.org>
Cc: Keyur Patel <keyur@arrcus.com>, "sidrops@ietf.org" <sidrops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAKr6gn0Vb+t7-ggZuSnOajaJAroeAGHZdoyz06YuV18FjbBTxw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <429EC453-8E4C-4E48-9CCA-EDB83A72E409@arrcus.com> <20171019190942.2E64AC668F3@minas-ithil.hactrn.net> <4BB6259E-F7C3-43BE-AC96-A77419445D30@gmail.com> <CAKr6gn0Vb+t7-ggZuSnOajaJAroeAGHZdoyz06YuV18FjbBTxw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/25.2 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/40jjQ6MHGxbSzvKoD1HG8w7vx_I>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] WG Adoption call for draft-ymbk-sidrops-ov-clarify (10/4 to 10/19)
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 02:38:03 -0000

> I had a minor kerfuffle around one paragraph, because of the repeated
> use of "their".. "they" discussing two parties (a local operator, and
> a neighbour) and the use of the posessive. I was confused about the
> specificity over who "they" is in each instance. I think that can be
> easily settled. and re-reading its not actually that unclear. Maybe
> this? (new words in [...])
> 
> 3.  Mark ALL Prefixes
> 
>    An operator should not have to hear from their neighbor that they
> announced an Invalid route [to that neighbor].  Their [own] routers
> should tell them before announcing the Invalid route to a neighbor.
> For this reason,

ack.  will hold for other revs

thanks!

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email