Re: [Sidrops] WG Adoption call for draft-ymbk-sidrops-ov-clarify (10/4 to 10/19)

I have read the draft and clarified some readings with the Author. I
think its sensible to make this stuff clear and its a short, direct
recommendation on two points: when to apply marking, and when to apply
decision-logic.

I had a minor kerfuffle around one paragraph, because of the repeated
use of "their".. "they" discussing two parties (a local operator, and
a neighbour) and the use of the posessive. I was confused about the
specificity over who "they" is in each instance. I think that can be
easily settled. and re-reading its not actually that unclear. Maybe
this? (new words in [...])

3.  Mark ALL Prefixes

   An operator should not have to hear from their neighbor that they
announced an Invalid route [to that neighbor].  Their [own] routers
should tell them before announcing the Invalid route to a neighbor.
For this reason,

I support adoption.

-G

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 5:57 AM, Carlos M. Martinez
<carlosm3011@gmail.com> wrote:
> Same. Read it, support adoption.
>
> On 19 Oct 2017, at 16:09, Rob Austein wrote:
>
>> Read it, support adoption.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sidrops mailing list
>> Sidrops@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sidrops mailing list
> Sidrops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops