IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sidrops] Validation re-reconsidered [internet-drafts@ietf.org: New Version Notification for draft-spaghetti-sidrops-rpki-validation-update-03.txt]

Job Snijders <job@fastly.com> Wed, 08 November 2023 18:21 UTC

Return-Path: <job@fastly.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00C12C1519B1 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:21:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fastly.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ww3nEdB_Nun3 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:21:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12f.google.com (mail-lf1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DA6BC151981 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Nov 2023 10:21:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-507c5249d55so9568271e87.3 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Nov 2023 10:21:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastly.com; s=google; t=1699467700; x=1700072500; darn=ietf.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=O2WvoerBnGEpwBYzuW1g8KRWrjksVzBI9h3+CREBg7Q=; b=asGJkOqnGuMg+pcttj6FJkLKG+R8gv40DRxv4GRO4y3DdJlI9w1LTrafu6qmxARRC3 gRX8S0CvAV0nAjNojKzC61+xa62tStEEMiU3b+NfDiORfpaxJsp7pzJX3ASQVjQ69pS/ gIWasn4oZMulttMu5OmYh4C297cf0zG+E596w=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1699467700; x=1700072500; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=O2WvoerBnGEpwBYzuW1g8KRWrjksVzBI9h3+CREBg7Q=; b=uHlRNDEraYrQ/mFff/Lik9R6vxod5120lg8kM/xIGTBIKMGqSX2FzStrAH3ZwOdsPD RmMgwYUAOEXCZxQGWbz0R2eHoHf0e0j1C+ojBTSjvTD8I7M4p1UepGQazHYoxgzcipwp UbHxlfmd9ysPYMj8ITI4REaCmJ5GI2MiKeXT8bO2JCpjpjBIV51NmdJ/xd9zmTJoxupN WLoYiw4f7dcPSxcQXR0C/UOmX2iYoKsX5C6dJkC7v05yBqWV/cocraSJMoZzn1nQKdnx Zx71iWPDhlq+Qn7kHRp3fcrpn8U4iqK99IqHGvdC9lLYelOj14f/1BmhhdQPlxF7vy4D JqDQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwHU3w5+j7DabLeeUmPrV9ydlVHI0EXrPsxp2H/eCoPdN8ncRWL 8/bRZGQQ+FK3PXEsyDhAyK2NwdMFzPkKl1a7Ns0fdQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHdprLGSzWX8k/rgnnu2hea3bq3vWwT/9s1R8qImo8MCEu111yD2uU6Asv7v5CkFpNNuZYLWg==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:3d1c:b0:507:99d6:95fc with SMTP id d28-20020a0565123d1c00b0050799d695fcmr2535217lfv.45.1699467700216; Wed, 08 Nov 2023 10:21:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from feather.sobornost.net ([62.168.35.11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u14-20020a50c04e000000b005412c0ba2f9sm7128514edd.13.2023.11.08.10.21.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 08 Nov 2023 10:21:39 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2023 18:21:38 +0000
From: Job Snijders <job@fastly.com>
To: Ties de Kock <tdekock@ripe.net>
Cc: sidrops@ietf.org
Message-ID: <ZUvRstLnt_YgPiL7@feather.sobornost.net>
References: <ZUqRGoTT/O1Q1bMO@snel> <B71DD28A-2ADC-4354-BC16-F33DCDC4AE1C@ripe.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <B71DD28A-2ADC-4354-BC16-F33DCDC4AE1C@ripe.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/FDjvJ3_SypQemWxZta3eIiits-E>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] Validation re-reconsidered [internet-drafts@ietf.org: New Version Notification for draft-spaghetti-sidrops-rpki-validation-update-03.txt]
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2023 18:21:46 -0000

Dear all,

I briefly met with Ties in the hallway at IETF 118.

On Wed, Nov 08, 2023 at 04:35:20PM +0100, Ties de Kock wrote:
> > - We do not expect or anticipate CAs to cooperate or coordinate: there
> > are too many CAs. The solution must come from the RP developer
> > community.
> 
> I think that coordinating with CAs is feasible, especially when it
> comes to RIR certificates.

While coordination across a large subset of the CAs indeed is possible,
getting 100% of CAs to take an action in a timely fashion is not
feasible. Noting there are 40,000+ CAs in the field, Ties and I agreed
that in this instance the easier path is for RP implementers to take an
action, and not require any CAs to take an action.

Kind regards,

Job

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email