IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Sidrops] [WG ADOPTION] draft-va-sidrops-deploy-reconsidered-01 - ENDS 08/11/2019 (Aug 11)

Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net> Sun, 21 July 2019 21:19 UTC

Return-Path: <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1C3120098; Sun, 21 Jul 2019 14:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_ALL=0.8, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bgjJvXUMV4NW; Sun, 21 Jul 2019 14:19:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.kvm02.ops-netman.net (relay.ops-netman.net [192.110.255.59]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C39312014F; Sun, 21 Jul 2019 14:19:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.ops-netman.net (mailserver.ops-netman.net [199.168.90.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay.kvm02.ops-netman.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19FB83FCF4; Sun, 21 Jul 2019 21:19:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from morrowc-glaptop2.ops-netman.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:0:2087:753d:e1fe:6c9a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ops-netman.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E51F8461; Sun, 21 Jul 2019 21:19:48 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 17:19:48 -0400
Message-ID: <yj9o7e8bjdaj.wl-morrowc@ops-netman.net>
From: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
To: sidrops@ietf.org, sidrops-chairs@ietf.org, sidrops-ads@ietf.org
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.2 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
Organization: Operations Network Management, Ltd.
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/LcgViVk96N5JOvbxzhXeLp6t5U0>
Subject: [Sidrops] [WG ADOPTION] draft-va-sidrops-deploy-reconsidered-01 - ENDS 08/11/2019 (Aug 11)
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2019 21:19:55 -0000

SIDROps folks!

Please consider this an adoption call for the subject draft, abstract
of which is:

  "This document defines a deployment model for reconsidered validation
   [RFC8360] in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI).

   It stipulates that Relying Parties in the RPKI MUST support
   reconsidered validation by 1 July TBD-Year, and that Certificate
   Authorities MAY use the reconsidered validation OIDs in CA
   certificates that they issue from this date.  Furthermore Certificate
   Authorities should monitor whether the set of resources in CA
   certificate they receive has shrunk, and make adjustments in the CA
   certificates and/or other RPKI objects when appropriate."

Please have a read, discuss, and comment over the next ~3 weeks period.
Thanks for your prompt attention to this matter.

-chris
co-boffin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email